When I add an image from the image browser to two different nodes, and then delete one of the nodes, the image appears to stay in the other (undeleted) node like it's supposed to. However, when I click edit for the undeleted node, the image link is broken, and the browser says it can't find the image.
The image location is listed as http://mysite.com/sites/default/files/imagecache//.

Comments

eugenmayer’s picture

eugenmayer commented

Well that looks like a bug. Thanks for reporting.

Can you reproduce it every time or is that just a sideeffect?

traceelements’s picture

traceelements commented

I can reproduce it every time. Also, thanks for the great module. I like it much better than Image Assist

eugenmayer’s picture

eugenmayer commented
Status: Active » Needs work

Thanks for confirming, will fix this for 2.9

traceelements’s picture

traceelements commented

Thanks!

miro_dietiker’s picture

miro_dietiker
Location Switzerland
commented

referring to a somehow similar case
#992438: node image changes if reused in comment

tseven’s picture

tseven commented

I am getting the same result of the source image displaying as "http://mysite.com/sites/default/files/imagecache//" but I haven't been able to isolate what is triggering it.

I have noticed that the node still holds the proper reference ie: [[wysiwyg_imageupload:137:]]
but there is no corresponding entry in the database.

After updating to the latest version WYSIWYG image upload (2.8) I've had 3 specific images disappear (seemingly randomly). Images created before the update are fine. Those three problematic images where created after the update and only belong to a single node which doesn't get touched. Seems like something else is deleting the entries.

Have some sort of garbage collection functions been implemented in this version? Something which might be mistaking valid images for old/deleted images?

Thanks

eugenmayer’s picture

eugenmayer commented

@6 Thanks for the investigation. Yes, there is such a method.

On cron run, after a treshhold of i think 30 minutes, every temporary entry gets removed. If you have a entry like [wui..:ID] in your content, but the corresponding relation is missing in the database, the garbage collection has removed it.

Did your images have been added to a CCK textfield-area? If yes, be aware that 2.8 does not support CCK at all, 2.9 will do so.

eugenmayer’s picture

eugenmayer commented
Status: Needs work » Closed (fixed)

that one was related to #992438: node image changes if reused in comment as miro mentioned above and is a dublicate. Its fixed in 2.9 therefore