Posted by bluecobalt on November 21, 2006 at 5:51pm
Jump to:
| Project: | Site tours with Amberjack |
| Version: | 5.x-1.x-dev |
| Component: | Code |
| Category: | bug report |
| Priority: | normal |
| Assigned: | Unassigned |
| Status: | active |
Issue Summary
Are you planning on creating a version for 4.7?
Many of us are going to be using 4.7 for months to come.
thanks,
blue
Comments
#1
I would venture a guess that backporting this to 4.7 would be difficult. 5.0 uses the JQuery javascript library 4.7 does not.
#2
Yes, however, there is the jQuery module for 4.7 - http://drupal.org/project/jquery47
#3
I second the request for a 4.7 version.
#4
me too - pretty please! :)
I have amberjack running standalone on my 4.7 site - but i'd really like a better way of creating tours so i don't have to have the amberjack markup at the bottom of page.tpl.php on every single page, even one's that aren't in the tour. It means I can only have one small tour or I'll end up with a huge page.tpl.php
Also have you looked at the possibility to create this as an extension to the playlist module, using audio_playlist.module as an example. The playlist module has a great interface for creating lists of any nodes, and these could then form the basis for an amberjack tour. just an idea.
I'll have a play with this module on my 5.0b1 test site, but a 4.7 version would be great!
#5
#6
Thank-you very much!!!
:)
steve
#7
This rocks but....
I'm running Drupal 4.7.3. I've installed the Amberjack 4.7.x-2.x-dev
I have what should be a 8 page tour. When you click on next arrow from 2 going to page 3 it jumps to page 7. Now, if you're on 7 and click back arrow it goes 6, 5, 4, 7. What can be so wrong with page 3 that this happens? How can this be fixed.
I've tried deleting that tour and creating another - still nadda. Anyone have any suggestions? (other than upgrading to 5)
Thanks!
#8
I guess you should check your page urls, and make sure you dont' have duplicates. Can you provide the url for the tour on your site, so I can check if there's something wrong?