Closed (won't fix)
Project:
Drupal.org site moderators
Component:
Other
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
14 Dec 2010 at 01:58 UTC
Updated:
31 May 2012 at 21:26 UTC
In looking over the front page of the "Cases" section (http://drupal.org/cases) I noticed that one user (Arnold Leung) added three of cases from his firm. In the interest of not turning that page into a link dump I think we need to have a rule about first posting to the issue queue with a request for addition. For now I've removed only one of the three posts Arnold added, however I think the other two should be removed as well until he asks for some community input.
Comments
Comment #1
alex ua commentedOops, fixed title.
Comment #2
Arnold Leung commentedHey guys.. me here.
So as to reduce/control the work load of webmasters, how about we have it such that if a case study has been approved for the front page, it can be added there without extra approval.?
I only added case studies that have been on the front page and hence pre-approved by webmasters..
I just think if we add this extra step, then its un-necessary extra work for webmasters..
Thoughts?
Arnold
Comment #3
alex ua commentedI think there are too many front page posts to allow them all on that list (unless we want a very long list). There was an issue that dealt with this (#372039: List out and migrate case studies from book pages to new Case study content type) as part of the redesign, and I think it warrants reopening that issue, as I think this should be part of a general improvement in the case studies. I think we should be looking to replace that page with a Solr-enabled view, so that people could drill down based on a number of criteria.
Comment #4
silverwing commentedA user should never add a site they created, funded or has any connection to without getting approval. Period.
I feel that an issue should be created to get added to the /cases page so webmasters can discuss the merits of being added. Like Alex said, it's not a link dump, so by reviewing sites we can (try to) get a good mix of sites on there.
Comment #5
alex ua commented#4 feels like the right way to go- I'll remove the items I find that were added by the companies that created them, if I can find them. @Arnold, can you open up issues for the sites you added, if you'd like them there again?
Comment #6
Arnold Leung commentedYeh ok.
Comment #7
Arnold Leung commentedHere we go.
http://drupal.org/node/1021820
Thanks,
Arnold
Comment #8
Arnold Leung commentedHey everyone. I am gonna raise the priority on this as its been sitting here for a while.
Thx.
Comment #9
silverwing commentedI'll add I don't believe there should be a requirement for a case study post to get listed in /cases.
Comment #10
Arnold Leung commentedOops raised the priority on the wrong issue.
Comment #11
avpaderno@silverwing: Do you mean users could add their show cases to that page?
Comment #12
avpadernoComment #13
Arnold Leung commentedSo whats the conclusion for the process??
This thread started on Dec 14th and it is now Jan 19th.
I have been trying to follow every step that I have been told here to add my case study back to the list, and I still dont know what the real process is.
This is getting real frustrating.
Comment #14
alex ua commented@Arnold- I hear you. IMO you have done everything you needed to get the WWF case study back on that page. My suggestion would be just to suggest adding it to a current category, as it seems that's what held things up in that issue. Then again INADOW (I'm Not A D.O. Webmaster), so I'm not really sure what my (or any non-webmasters) input is worth.
Comment #15
Arnold Leung commentedWell I am ok with using the existing category...
Comment #16
avpadernoComment #17
tvn commentedThere is now new case studies section http://drupal.org/case-studies. Old /cases page got unpublished and now redirects to /case-studies. Closing as this issue is no longer relevant.