In looking over the front page of the "Cases" section (http://drupal.org/cases) I noticed that one user (Arnold Leung) added three of cases from his firm. In the interest of not turning that page into a link dump I think we need to have a rule about first posting to the issue queue with a request for addition. For now I've removed only one of the three posts Arnold added, however I think the other two should be removed as well until he asks for some community input.

Comments

alex ua’s picture

Title: Process for adding sites to » Process for adding sites to http://drupal.org/cases

Oops, fixed title.

Arnold Leung’s picture

Hey guys.. me here.

So as to reduce/control the work load of webmasters, how about we have it such that if a case study has been approved for the front page, it can be added there without extra approval.?

I only added case studies that have been on the front page and hence pre-approved by webmasters..

I just think if we add this extra step, then its un-necessary extra work for webmasters..

Thoughts?

Arnold

alex ua’s picture

I think there are too many front page posts to allow them all on that list (unless we want a very long list). There was an issue that dealt with this (#372039: List out and migrate case studies from book pages to new Case study content type) as part of the redesign, and I think it warrants reopening that issue, as I think this should be part of a general improvement in the case studies. I think we should be looking to replace that page with a Solr-enabled view, so that people could drill down based on a number of criteria.

silverwing’s picture

Category: support » task

A user should never add a site they created, funded or has any connection to without getting approval. Period.

I feel that an issue should be created to get added to the /cases page so webmasters can discuss the merits of being added. Like Alex said, it's not a link dump, so by reviewing sites we can (try to) get a good mix of sites on there.

alex ua’s picture

#4 feels like the right way to go- I'll remove the items I find that were added by the companies that created them, if I can find them. @Arnold, can you open up issues for the sites you added, if you'd like them there again?

Arnold Leung’s picture

Yeh ok.

Arnold Leung’s picture

Here we go.

http://drupal.org/node/1021820

Thanks,
Arnold

Arnold Leung’s picture

Priority: Normal » Major

Hey everyone. I am gonna raise the priority on this as its been sitting here for a while.

Thx.

silverwing’s picture

I'll add I don't believe there should be a requirement for a case study post to get listed in /cases.

Arnold Leung’s picture

Priority: Major » Normal

Oops raised the priority on the wrong issue.

avpaderno’s picture

@silverwing: Do you mean users could add their show cases to that page?

avpaderno’s picture

Component: Textual improvements » Case studies
Arnold Leung’s picture

So whats the conclusion for the process??

This thread started on Dec 14th and it is now Jan 19th.

I have been trying to follow every step that I have been told here to add my case study back to the list, and I still dont know what the real process is.

This is getting real frustrating.

alex ua’s picture

@Arnold- I hear you. IMO you have done everything you needed to get the WWF case study back on that page. My suggestion would be just to suggest adding it to a current category, as it seems that's what held things up in that issue. Then again INADOW (I'm Not A D.O. Webmaster), so I'm not really sure what my (or any non-webmasters) input is worth.

Arnold Leung’s picture

Well I am ok with using the existing category...

avpaderno’s picture

Component: Case studies » Other
tvn’s picture

Status: Active » Closed (won't fix)

There is now new case studies section http://drupal.org/case-studies. Old /cases page got unpublished and now redirects to /case-studies. Closing as this issue is no longer relevant.