I'm thinking of a "Add one more" edit widget like its in CCK multi-value fields. Maybe add an combo box after each url which defines what content to expect from the url ( like RSS, CVS and so on ).

If this feature gets it into feeds we could also close #856316: Add option to make source URL/file not required for importers attached to nodes

Comments

sevanden’s picture

sevanden CreditAttribution: sevanden commented

This would indeed be interesting, especially for websites that provide multiple feeds (let's say different product categories of a company) but where the feeds are coming from the same source website.

Looking forward to see this ...

adamtong’s picture

adamtong CreditAttribution: adamtong commented
Version: 6.x-1.x-dev » 7.x-2.x-dev

I want to have this feature too!!

Can 7.x version do it?

Thank you!

ggevalt’s picture

ggevalt CreditAttribution: ggevalt commented
Version: 7.x-2.x-dev » 6.x-1.x-dev

I echo adam... This would be a great feature in Drupal 6 version... we face the prospect of having to create 50+ of these feeds from our own multisite configuration... Is there a workaround that allows one feed to cover multiple urls?

THANKS!

g

twistor’s picture

twistor CreditAttribution: twistor commented
Version: 6.x-1.x-dev » 7.x-2.x-dev

If you attach the feed to a node, then you just have to create 50 nodes.

New features go into Drupal 7 first.

aalireza’s picture

aalireza CreditAttribution: aalireza commented
Issue summary: View changes

Any News ?
when this feature add to drupal 7 Feeds ?

mv1st’s picture

mv1st CreditAttribution: mv1st commented

I would love to see this feature too. I have 50+ importers that all go to the same content type and it would be great to remove the step of creating a new importer each time I want to add a feed. Great module BTW.

twistor’s picture

twistor CreditAttribution: twistor commented

@mv1st, I think you are confused. If you want to have multiple feeds use the same importer, you should use the "Attach to content type" setting. Then, you can add a feed just by adding a node.

mv1st’s picture

mv1st CreditAttribution: mv1st commented

@twistor, thank you for the tip. I am not sure why but I have always found that method sloppy even though it is no more so than what I am doing now. I guess I always figured an "add one more" type system would be implemented and that my way would be an easier migration. Beginning to think I was wrong :)