Support for Drupal 7 is ending on 5 January 2025—it’s time to migrate to Drupal 10! Learn about the many benefits of Drupal 10 and find migration tools in our resource center.
Unlike in CVS, "master" doesn't mean anything special. I'd like to rename it to 7.x-1.x to be clearer. Any objections?
Comments
Comment #1
deekayen CreditAttribution: deekayen commentedNope. I started to do it, but didn't follow-through with the remote renaming. Go ahead.
Comment #2
scor CreditAttribution: scor commentednot sure an actual remote renaming advised. I would think that branching master into 7.x-1.x and emptying master is a safer option: http://drupal.org/node/1127732
Comment #3
scor CreditAttribution: scor commentedlooks like this is actually already done: http://drupalcode.org/project/masquerade.git/shortlog/refs/heads/7.x-1.x (master's not empty though).
Comment #4
Kars-T CreditAttribution: Kars-T commentedHi
I tried this for my project http://drupal.org/project/bulkdelete and as the documentation above says you can just empty the master branch and live with it. It can't be deleted as HEAD points to it.
Otherewise there are no problems working with git and having no master branch. Just make a new release of a tag any branch.
I set this to RTBC :)
Comment #5
deviantintegral CreditAttribution: deviantintegral commentedYeah, emptying master is the best option until #1074960: Let maintainers set a default branch on git repositories is fixed.
Comment #6
andypostLet's leave 7.x alone and prepare 8.x branch instead
Comment #7
deekayen CreditAttribution: deekayen commentedi emptied master last week.