We are happy to report that the domain Drupal.com has been generously donated by Cedric Johnson of the OpenDomain.org organization. The domain had been obtained by OpenDomain.org as part of their effort to become involved in open source projects by buying expensive domains and letting projects build websites with them. According to Cedric Johnson, “We don’t sell domains nor do we transfer them. Instead, we buy domains so organizations that share our view of responsible open sourcing can use them for free in promoting these open technologies. It’s a different way to contribute to open sourcing, and it’s the kind of collaborative spirit that made the Internet possible.” In the case of Drupal.com, the domain has been transferred directly to Dries, free of charge, as an outright donation to the Drupal project.

OpenDomain.org has asked that the domain be used to create a website which focuses more on the commercial side of Drupal than Drupal.org is able to. The exact nature of that site has not yet been decided.

On behalf of Dries and the Drupal community, I would like to thank Cedric Johnson and OpenDomain.org for their generosity. By deciding to donate the Drupal.com domain in this manner they have shown a genuine desire to help the Drupal project.

I would also like to add that when news of the Drupal.com acquisition first appeared here, I was among the most vocal skeptics of OpenDomain's intentions and methodologies. In the time since then, my interactions with Cedric and OpenDomain.org have been conducted professionally and in a friendly manner, and the outright gift of Drupal.com to Dries has put any criticisms I may have had to rest.

Update: Sept. 30 18:00

As per Dries comment below, I want to clarify that the domain was donated to Dries, personally, and that the commercial requirement was not part of the final agreement.

Comments

drawk’s picture

That's excellent news. The discussion about what sort of site should live at drupal.com is bound to be an interesting one.

I foresee a busy future for the Drupal marketing group :)

---
www.whatwoulddrupaldo.org

bertboerland’s picture

but do we /need/ it? I have said this before but I really like drupal.org to be the hub for all drupal sites (we can have a block going to business.drupal.org, conference,drupal.org, association.drupal.org etc).

IMHO it is best to use our "corporate image" (eg drupal.org) to be the hub instead of having content sites all around.

--
groets
bertb

--
groets
bert boerland

Dries’s picture

It should be clear that the domain was donated to me, and not to the Drupal community. The OpenDomain.org people specifically encouraged me to use the domain to start a company, and to offer a service similar to wordpress.com. In fact, one of the initial requirements for the transfer was that the domain was used strictly for commercial purposes. After negotiatons that is no longer a requirement, and we could actually use the domain for community/non-profit purposes. Robert's wording is unfortunate as it suggests that the domain was donated to the Drupal community (through me). At this point, it is not clear what the domain will be used for. I might donate it to the Drupal community at some point (eg. to the mythical marketing team), but I don't have to. It is perfectly OK to brainstorm about how we can take advantage of the drupal.com domain but know that there are no guarantees.

inforeto’s picture

.com ---> Distros.
Resources for End users seeking solutions, and man power to get their jobs done. (theirs, not ours)
Only lists packages, websites, and all sort of services, not forums or knowledge bases.
People do seek drupal first and distributors later, so there ought to be interest.

.org ---> Core.
Coders seeking plataforms. The CMS and its contributions. (in full drupal interests).
All help to users could stay in these forums, to keep the troubleshooters and developers in one place as currently.

BryanSD’s picture

I'm personally glad we're not seeing too much discussion on what should be done with drupal.com. I'm hoping that it shows the community understands that Dries needs the time to consider all the options. I personally do not have a problem with drupal.com not being community owned. If drupal.com is to be used for commercial purposes...good business decisions are often made not by popular vote but by strong leadership of a few individuals. Of course, it is important for those leaders to recognize the customers are the one that really hold the genuine power over a business.

Using drupal.com for something like wordpress.com may not be a bad idea. However, it may be best to hold onto the domain until the right cutting edge idea comes along. Either way, congratulations to Dries for finally having ownership to something that I have always felt was his in the first place. IMHO.

Bryan
CMSReport

Caleb G2’s picture

At least if there is the slightest bit of possibility that you might be/get aggravated at watching everyone else figure out a way to leverage the brillance of Drupal into something profitable. Anyone who has a problem with the founder figuring out how to find a niche for himself has issues, methinks.

Is open source really supposed to equal, "I'm not supposed to make a living"? And are the two idea, e.g., being an "open source" community and "making a living" mutually exclusive?

====
My dog left home because I kept eating his dog food.

Robardi56’s picture

Hi,
what about making drupal.com a company with professional, paid drupal consulting and support ?

Brakkar

Muslim guy’s picture

Redirect to Drupal.org?

Or a `base camp'

Or `Drupal kids' - for young developers and future webmasters

Or Drupal Fanzine similar to SpreadFirefox.com (which does not host Firefox downloads but marketing it)

And uhmmmm.....make the Drupal.com theme something like a Yahoo.com and make it free to copy the style.css and its layout

Cheers

Viva le Drupal

pamphile’s picture

I remember that issue.

This is very good news. I am glad that everything worked out well.

Marcel
http://01wholesale.com
http://businessletters.com

kylebrotherton’s picture

After reading through all of the related comments in the other threads, I'm intrigued by this story. I still can't figure out the motives of the OpenDomain guy, but I'm satisfied with the result.

I own three domains relating to open-source (identical phrase in .com .net and .org). The domains are generic, and identical. They include the word 'distro'. I had offered them for sale. But, now I think I'd like to donate them.
I would appreciate some advise or answers to these questions:
1. What group or project would be interested in using the domains?
2. If you can't answer #1, where could I possibly find an answer?
3. When I identify the group or project, how should I approach them?

After the controversy witnessed in the drupal and wordpress forums regarding OpenDomain, question #3 is very important. I don't want to get off on the wrong foot.

Since the domains are currently offered for sale, I'm not mentioning them here. I don't want anyone to think I'm spamming. If you need to know, you can ask me.

OpenDomain’s picture

If you would like some advice for domains, feel free to contact me at OpenDomain.Org

Domains are very funny

Some people get VERY scared when you mention selling them. I have never sold any domain, but I do not think it is wrong to do so. Look at some of the backlash I received when I tried to GIVE my domains away. Be very careful!

  1. To find your market - cross index your keywords in several searches, including newsgroups
  2. Offer the domain for Free, see who approaches you. Also, check your server logs to see where your visitors are coming from.
  3. Due to certain rules with domains, if you approach a group yourself, you may get in trouble very quickly. Have a friend of the community introduce you.
Lenen’s picture

I'm scared I get scammed every time I sell domains!

pamphile’s picture

pbowyer’s picture

An organisation buying up expensive domains to donate to OS projects seems to be playing into the hands of domain squatters - "Hey look, we can get rich and it doesn't even hurt legitimate projects!"

OpenDomain’s picture

Someone pointed out that this profits squatters, and in this way I am doing harm.
BUT - now Dries can do whatever he wants to with Drupal.Com. Is that worth it? I hope so.

Carlos Miranda Levy’s picture

Just my 2 cents on this topic...

I've been buying domains for some 10 years now. I've own over 250 (when they were expensive at $35) and I've lost a few very good ones for not renewing them. I currently own some 125 domains in three languages, from 3-letter domain names to pretty long ones .

In every case I bought the domains to develop projects and in most cases, I have never developed those projects. I do have however some 35 active projects using most of the domains and most of the domain point to those projects.

A couple of years ago, I realized that I am more some sort of a domain collector, buying nice names as a hobby when I think them up or return from a conference or read an article, or like for my family name when my dad died or for the girl who is now my wife when I was courting her.

Owning a domain is a perfectly legal activity. And owning a domain and not doing anything with it is also legal. I consider my domain collection part of my personal investment and of the wealth I have built over the years. While my case may be a little different (I have only bought one domain in the "aftermarket" at a US$350 price and the rest I bought directly from regular Domain registrars, I have never registered domains related to trademarks or project names and I have never sold any domain, although I have been offered over US$5,000 for some of my domains), I don't think it's nice to bash someone for buying or owning a domain or offering to do something with it.

I own several domains that could be put to good use by open source and civil society communities and, while I accept that my argument of "I plan to do something with them" is not a good excuse for not doing anything with them, I don't think anyone should be allowed to criticize me for not putting them to better use or donating them to others. A domain does not make or break a community. It hardly builds traffic by itself unless good content is put behind it and if content is any good, the site will build traffic even without a good domain...

OpenDomain did the right thing by releasing the name to the proper stakeholder and we should thank Cedric for doing so, not just because it was the ethical and right thing to do, but because he had no obligation to do so.

I've lost domains to cybersquatters, and before they have fallen in the hands of cybersquatters I've been requested outrageous prices of some US$250 from the registrars to renew them in the so-called redemption ("exploitation" would be more appropriate) period. Offended by this unethical practice I refused to negotiate initially, hoping to renew the domains when it became freely, only to have a cybersquatter grab the domain later and refuse to negotiate since they were doing so well with the traffic I had built over the years.

Anyway, my 2 cents are already running for like US$50 of gibberish...

Point is, domains are a commodity freely available at a price. If you set up a project, skip your daily cup of coffee or your bagel or whatever it is you do for a week and get the corresponding domain before someone does. Because if you don't, someone will and it will be a sad situation when it happens.

The story of Drupal had a happy ending, like so many others -- which is a tribute to the collaboration spirit and natural kindness of man/womankind --, and OpenDomain got a great deal of free publicity from it, which more than pays for the investment they made when they acquired the domain.

Sad but true, everything has a value... As said before, the value of Drupal comes as much from the fact that it is an exceptional piece of software as from the outstanding community constantly evolving around it. This spin of the wheel, it was OpenDomain who cashed in on that value through publicity (not free, since if I recall correctly Cedric paid a bunch for the domain a while ago).

Let's hope that the next time, it is the community or Dries himself who cashes in on the value built by each and everyone of us...

There, my US$50.02 of gibberish on the topic...

------
Con paciencia y calma,
sube un burro a una palma

Leeteq’s picture

I think the Drupal community at large and the further developments would benefit from having a site that focused on business opportunities that could finance further development, and related marketing efforts.

There is a huge opportunity and challenge to be dealt with regarding making Drupal more fit for various business sites.

.
--
( Evaluating the long-term route for Drupal 7.x via BackdropCMS at https://www.CMX.zone )

dasfljsdfasdf’s picture

All I can say is Hip Hip, Hurray, and that about sums it all up.
-Ethan Neuen

Dublin Drupaller’s picture

Hi Daniel,

I agree that there is an opportunity there...but, I also think it needs to be thought through properly, so we don't end up with what's happened with other open source projects that came to that commercial crossroads and took a wrong turn.

In other words, the real strength of the Drupal project (or any open source project) is it's community, not the code and without mentioning any product names, a common scenario when a project reaches a certain level is that the core community splits and spins off in their own directions.

In other words, you end up with a "them and us" situation..a commercial dotcom community and a more opensource/DIY orientated dotorg community.

Unfortunately, usually all the "good stuff" ends up in the commercial dotcom bit and the dotorg community become reluctant to contribute back into the project - because they see others selling those contributions, or variations of contributions. And it's a downward spiral from there.

The trick is to come up with a framework that encourages those 2 core communities to co-exist instead of living apart and maintaining the status quo on how to contribute back to Drupal.

In that context, I'm not so sure having the Drupal dotcom site focussed on "business opportunities"is such a good idea. I maybe wrong, but, my knee jerk reaction would be to try and blend the 2 communities together rather than seperate them out.

how that is done, is another story.

In the context of this thread...I think it's good news that Roberts canvassing has brought about a change of mind with the guys at opendomain.org.

Well done Robert Douglass. Yet again!

Dub

Currently in Switzerland working as an Application Developer with UBS Investment Bank...using Drupal 7 and lots of swiss chocolate

OpenDomain’s picture

I am sorry my message has been so unclear. I would like to apologize for the mistakes I made in OpenDomain, especially to Matt Mullenweg. We eventually resolved our differences, and the important thing is that WordPress.Com is being used by the right people now.

I welcome ANY comments about OpenDomain, as it will only help my project get stronger.

Thank you Robert and Dries, for talking with me and having faith to see this though.

Walt Esquivel’s picture

Hi Cedric,

Just wanted to say thanks to you and OpenDomain for giving Dries the drupal.com domain name.

By the way, you and OpenDomain are mentioned very positively on Yahoo!

OpenDomain Donates Use of Web Addresses to Encourage Online Collaboration
Friday September 29, 9:52 am ET
'Anti-squatter' helps firms use and support open sourcing

MECHANICSBURG, Pa., Sept. 29 /PRNewswire/ -- He is the "anti-squatter."

A Pennsylvania entrepreneur who owns registered Internet Web site domain names is allowing individuals and organizations to use many of them for free to encourage people who develop Internet applications to share information and contribute computer codes online.

And here's a quote from Dries:

"OpenDomain.Org acquired Drupal.Com at great expense, and in donating it to Drupal, has shown sincere altruism and generosity and has made a significant contribution to the larger effort of creating a great open-source software product," said Dries Buytaert, founder of Drupal, an open source content management platform. "OpenDomain's generous donation will enable us to extend Drupal's presence and facilitate continued growth of the Drupal project. We are very grateful for this contribution."

Walt Esquivel, MBA, MA
President, Wellness Corps; Captain, USMC (Veteran)
$50 Hosting Discount Helps Projects Needing Financing

pamphile’s picture

i had a few drupal domains. Instead of letting them expire and get grabbed by speculators I sold them for $20 http://drupal.org/node/79440

DrupalBlog.com sold for $20. I would have gladly sold it for $10 to anyone in the community.

3 other domains are about to expire, including drupalirc.com.

marcel
http://tinyhttp.com - short url engine

Natlang’s picture

Perhaps the .com side could be a Drupal services auction site. Anything from installation help to writing custom modules, etc. This could be profitable both to Dries (through commissions) and "the community", and presumably to the people who are paying for the help... I am sure someone already thought of this.

Wolfflow’s picture

It's a feeling of delight at being entertained with all this comments about this Domain Issue.

.First I'm glad Dries finally got what without any doubt belongs to him. Give Cesar what belong to him ....(Joke ;-)

.Second I really do have a light imagination on what I in place of Dries would do with that, but surely I would not tell anyone. ;-)

.Third I think we should all be happy and busy that we got Drupal.org and all we can develop further with it. Lets go back to contribute! ;-)

Cheers

BTW Who ever was involved in this transfer I think that he did the best out of it !!!

Share your experience with the Open Source Community it's not only a choice but a Life Philosophy !!!
Do you care? Adaccs Scoops

Contact me for drupal projects in English, German, Italian, Drupal Hosting Support.