I found no way to not set CC for the nodes of CC enabled type.
Thanks for help

Comments

balleyne’s picture

If I understand correctly, you've enabled CC-licensing for a particular content type, but you want to have some nodes of that type without a license?

As of now, the module treats All Rights Reserved as the "None" license (since that's the default in modern copyright law...). So, make sure that "None (All Rights Reserved)" is an available license type at /admin/settings/creativecommons, and then you use that if you don't want to specify a CC license for a node.

jvieille’s picture

Thanks, but I really want not having any CC information appearing:
- "None" is the most constraining licence, attributing the work to the author without any implicit authorization.
- Public also attributes the work to the author,even if no restrictions apply,

so no available option is appropriate.
I think one option is missing: "Void" for example that would not display anything

codare’s picture

Hi - I think I have the same, if not a similar, issue.

We intend having a mixture of uploaded and attached content on our site with some of the items being licensed as Royalty Free and some being CC, whilst others having the license info already contained in the id3 section of the file. We would like the "Creative Commons License" field in a create new content form to be optional - at the moment it seems to be required and I haven't been able to find out where to switch of the "This field is required" option (making it optional doesn't seem to be an option).

Regards
:-)
codare

balleyne’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » balleyne
Status: Active » Needs work

Ah, okay, here's the problem: in 2009, the required field was collapsed into "all rights reserved", because All Rights Reserved was just blank, didn't display any information.

But, as of late 2009 or early 2010, all rights reserved is now displaying license information, due to requirements of some other users.

I think the easiest solution would be to re-implement the required flag, so that the license selection can be optional. The one catch is that, as I remember, the license was set to blank to signify all rights reserved, so this might make it a bit confusing to distinguish between to information and all rights reserved...

Let me take a look and see how doable it is with the current code base.