Closed (fixed)
Project:
HTML5 Base
Version:
7.x-2.x-dev
Component:
Markup
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
22 Jan 2011 at 18:30 UTC
Updated:
23 Jul 2011 at 19:21 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
jensimmons commentedComment #2
tim.plunkettComment #3
tim.plunkettSprint!
Comment #4
jensimmons commentedNeed to consider ARIA roles for the node.tpl.php file.
Comment #5
tim.plunkettnode.tpl.php: http://drupal.org/cvs?commit=487070
Comment #6
jensimmons commentedbig discussion on field, not changing anything about it right now.
Comment #7
alanburke commentedHow about changing
to
Comment #8
mason@thecodingdesigner.com commentedWe talked about that in the room, but didn't come to a consensus to make it a SECTION. In the end we decided that if we couldn't agree that it might be best to leave it as a DIV. Some thought it should be a non-semantic container, others see your side.
I think it makes sense as a SECTION, but I'd like others to weigh in before changing it.
Comment #9
Anonymous (not verified) commentedI would like to see it as a section.
Also, we may want to consider using the time element and possibly the pubdate attribute to markup the published date. (I just happen to be reading up on the time element and saw this, so I thought I'd add it here).
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-time-element
Comment #10
mason@thecodingdesigner.com commentedWe discussed the published date as well.
One thing we're trying to do is that since we're building this as a draft of what we want drupal core markup defaults to be we're avoiding preprocessing as much as possible. Anything that requires preprocessing we're pushing over to HTML5_tools module. That way these things can be enabled separately and applied to any theme.
The issue for that feature is here: http://drupal.org/node/1036784
Comment #11
tim.plunkettComment #12
jensimmons commented