Needs review
Project:
Userpoints Node Access
Version:
7.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
8 Feb 2011 at 00:03 UTC
Updated:
6 Jul 2011 at 16:16 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
BenK commentedHave we changed this?
Comment #2
berdirNo.
I also improved the summaries (and added a summary for the general settings) and tried to make it more consistent and in useful order with userpoints_nc.
So it is now "Content access" for the general settings and "!Points for content access". I played around with "gaining" but didn't really like that, I think just content access is better.
Comment #3
BenK commentedHey Berdir,
Great to hear from you! I definitely want to get some momentum back on our various modules.
I like your changes, except that I use the fairly popular Content Access module on many of the same sites. So I find the language a little confusing. I'm not sure if there is an alternative, though. Maybe "Grant access" for the settings and "Grant access for !points" for the content type?
--Ben
Comment #4
berdirMaybe... I see the problem that it could be confusing to use "content access". But "Grant" is IMHO wrong too, you don't grant access, you allow users to gain/buy/whatever access.
Note that we are currently using "!Points for ..." instead of the other way round as you suggested for a number of other vertical tabs from userpoints_nc. We might want to keep the consistency...