For the mapbuilder project 2 releases have been defined with the same name (see http://drupal.org/node/108835/release). When HEAD was still compatible with Drupal version 4.7, I created release http://drupal.org/node/109151 but now HEAD has moved on to Drupal 5.0. So I would like to make another project release for the HEAD version, but it (http://drupal.org/node/109151) needs to be removed first.

Thank you.

Comments

dww’s picture

dww
we/he/they
commented
Assigned: Unassigned » dww
Status: Active » Fixed

i just changed the version info for your HEAD node, and re-ran the packaging script to clean up everything.
please edit the release notes for http://drupal.org/node/109151, i just reset them to something simple.

it's really odd that the release system let you add 2 release nodes with the same version string, i didn't think that was possible. ;) weird.

also, b/c of this confusion w/ 2 releases with the same version, the 2 issues in your issue queue that used to think they were "4.7.x-1.x-dev" were in fact pointing to your HEAD release, so they now think they're version "5.x-1.x-dev". you should probably followup to those 2 and re-assign them to 4.7.x.

that should be everything, please set this back to active if there's anything else.

cheers,
-derek

jpulles’s picture

jpulles commented
Status: Fixed » Active

Thanks for your prompt fix!

I'm not certain if something is still wrong, or that i have to wait for the next batch run. The 4.7.x archive included the .info file, while according to http://cvs.drupal.org/viewcvs/drupal/contributions/modules/mapbuilder/?o... it should not be included there. So maybe the archive is not (yet) build from the correct sources?

John.

dww’s picture

dww
we/he/they
commented
Status: Active » Fixed

yup, the 4.7.x tarball that was still there was the old one from HEAD, and you hadn't checked in anything to the DRUPAL-4-7 branch, so the packaging script didn't rebuild it. i should have just removed both of the tarballs and had it regenerate everything once i fixed up the release nodes, which is what i just did. it's all happy now.

cheers,
-derek

jpulles’s picture

jpulles commented
Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Ok, thanks again and closed :-)

Component: CVS » Other