Closed (won't fix)
Project:
Documentation
Component:
Correction/Clarification
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
1 Feb 2007 at 04:03 UTC
Updated:
28 Jul 2011 at 19:09 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
pwolanin commentedI don't see it anywhere, but it might be better to put it under the history section, with a link from the page you reference (which is already chock full of info):
http://drupal.org/History-mission-and-community
Comment #2
betz commentedChanged the component to reflect the new component categorization. See http://drupal.org/node/301443
Comment #3
ronaldmulero commentedAdded link to CHANGELOG.txt of most current Drupal release in second-to-last paragraph of http://drupal.org/node/769
Comment #4
dami commentedIt turned out it's not that simple as I thought, drawing timeline in excel, and I am not a chart wizard...
After lots of trial and errors, this is the best I can do. (png file attached)
Comment #5
dami commentedA second thought, a chart looks nice, but will need to be updated manually.
Linking to CHANGELOG.txt (already doen in #3) may be better.
Comment #6
betz commentedwell done
Comment #7
gpk commentedGreat timeline. Also included link to #4 above on the History page.
How about attaching the spreadsheet to this issue so that someone else can update it as and when if they feel motivated.
Comment #8
dami commentedSure, the spreadsheet is based on a timeline template at : http://www.vertex42.com/ExcelArticles/create-a-timeline.html
I changed the way how error bars and data points are formatted. There are quite a few improvements I'd like to make but couldn't figure out how. For example, data labels need manual edits, I couldn't figure out how to make it automatic. Hope somebody with ninja excel skills will make the spreadsheet better.
Comment #9
leehunter commentedComment #11
chx commentedWhy was this closed down? It certainly could be made better as dami noted.
Comment #12
leehunter commentedEverything in documentation can be made better. It's only needs to be an issue if there's something specific that needs to be done.
Comment #13
figaro commented@dami: your image is fine as it is, suggest you contact the documentation team to create a page for you to upload this image and trust that people will update this over time.
Comment #14
arianek commentedbunk comment, did not read properly
Comment #15
arianek commentedcan someone update this image or suggest an easier way to keep this maintained? (that seems pretty labour intensive) - we could put it near to the release cycle page http://drupal.org/node/935558
Comment #16
hshana commentedHere's an updated version.
Comment #17
leehunter commentedMarking as closed, won't fix.
Historical information is not documentation. It should probably go in Wikipedia if people want to maintain this record.