At one point there was discussion about adding in property_info callbacks for entity framework. #1117464: Search API integration comments 18-22 or so.
This patch was never committed. The patch didn't go far enough to create the correct mappings for all the values. Attached is a patch, review needed, that will add correcty entity property info to geofield.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #8 | 1285176-geofield-property-info.patch | 3.61 KB | wesnick |
| #3 | entity-integration-1285175-3.patch | 2.79 KB | gagarine |
| property-info-callbacks.patch | 2.85 KB | wesnick |
Comments
Comment #1
gagarine commentedThere is a 7.x-1.x-entity-integration branch see http://drupal.org/node/1117464#comment-4497092.
I keep this open, I think this is a separate issue and the '7.x-1.x-entity-integration' branch should be merged in the main branch or your patch committed.
#1153480: geofield_field_info should set a property_type was closed as duplicate.
Comment #2
gagarine commentedComment #3
gagarine commentedThe changes made by David Peterson but against 7.x-1 branch to avoid merge conflicts.
Comment #4
mollux commentedsub
Comment #5
dasjoComment #6
mollux commentedis there news when the patch will be committed?
Comment #7
Brandonian commentedI'll take a look at it during the next round of updates.
Comment #8
wesnick commentedAttached current version of the patch that I am using.
Comment #9
davidseth commentedThe patch at #8 looks good. More features then the one I initially had in place at #1117464: Search API integration.
I will commit this with the latest dev release of geofield '7.x-1.x-entity-integration' branch soon.
Cheers,
David
Comment #10
davidseth commentedOkay, just pushed up changes from #8 to http://drupal.org/node/1087170/git-instructions/7.x-1.x-entity-integration branch. Thanks @wesnick
Comment #11
Brandonian commenteddavidseth, I'm planning on pushing another release soon on the main branch. Is the entity-integration branch at a point where it's stable enough to merge into the main branch? Is there anything I can do to help facilitate that?
I'll be on IRC (Brandonian) all day, ping me if we need to chat.
Thanks all for the hard work on this branch.
Comment #12
davidseth commented@Brandonian it is good. I have been using it in a number of projects and really all it is doing is exposing some additional callbacks to the Entity module so any potential for instability is *very* small. So please, go ahead and role it into the main branch. That would be great! Thanks.
Comment #13
Brandonian commented@davidseth, I had trouble merging branches between the two b/c of some recent developments on the main branch, but I think I pulled in everything properly by hand on the last commit on the main branch. Can you confirm that everything look ok before marking this ticket fixed?
Comment #14
gagarine commented@Brandonian I compared the patch from #8 with your commit and see no difference. I'm curious if this is compatible with Search API spatial.
Comment #15
davidseth commented#13 Looks good. Thanks @Brandonian
Comment #16
gagarine commentedsound we can marked as reviewed. I let Brandonian close the issue.
Comment #17
Brandonian commentedMarking as fixed. Thanks guys.