You might imagine that I'm somehow disappointed about this fork. Thickbox support could have been introduced to Inline module instead. Together with the latest Imagecache support in Inline this would provide even more benefits for Inline users. Module confusion regarding image and input filter modules is unnecessarily raised.

Could you please explain in detail the differences to Inline module and your motivation to fork it?

Comments

he_who_shall_not_be_named’s picture

1) http://drupal.org/node/83516
2)The thumbnail size behavior is better than the 'Maximum width and height'
3) I want to add a feature to filter all the images from the nodes (also the Only local images are allowed.)

he_who_shall_not_be_named’s picture

Status: Active » Closed (won't fix)
he_who_shall_not_be_named’s picture

Category: task » support
Status: Closed (won't fix) » Active
catch’s picture

catch’s picture

1) http://drupal.org/node/83516 - it looks like you got plenty of feedback on that thread, plus a patch, but then forked anyway.

2)The thumbnail size behavior is better than the 'Maximum width and height' - imagecache works great. If you think your resizing works better, you could submit patches to that.

3) I want to add a feature to filter all the images from the nodes (also the ) - judging by sun's posts on this thread, it would appear that they'd accept feature requests with patches to inline.module

sun’s picture

Status: Active » Closed (works as designed)

Trial and error.

he_who_shall_not_be_named’s picture

Status: Closed (works as designed) » Closed (fixed)

The img for drupal 6.x version is incomparable different than inline. Try it yourself. :)

Project: » Lost & found issues

This issue’s project has disappeared. Most likely, it was a sandbox project, which can be deleted by its maintainer. See the Lost & found issues project page for more details. (The missing project ID was 150270)