Closed (fixed)
Project:
Lost & found issues
Component:
Documentation
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
9 Jun 2007 at 22:55 UTC
Updated:
27 Mar 2008 at 12:17 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
You might imagine that I'm somehow disappointed about this fork. Thickbox support could have been introduced to Inline module instead. Together with the latest Imagecache support in Inline this would provide even more benefits for Inline users. Module confusion regarding image and input filter modules is unnecessarily raised.
Could you please explain in detail the differences to Inline module and your motivation to fork it?
Comments
Comment #1
he_who_shall_not_be_named commented1) http://drupal.org/node/83516
)
2)The thumbnail size behavior is better than the 'Maximum width and height'
3) I want to add a feature to filter all the images from the nodes (also the
Comment #2
he_who_shall_not_be_named commentedComment #3
he_who_shall_not_be_named commentedComment #4
catchhttp://drupal.org/node/153636
was duplicate
Comment #5
catch1) http://drupal.org/node/83516 - it looks like you got plenty of feedback on that thread, plus a patch, but then forked anyway.
2)The thumbnail size behavior is better than the 'Maximum width and height' - imagecache works great. If you think your resizing works better, you could submit patches to that.
3) I want to add a feature to filter all the images from the nodes (also the ) - judging by sun's posts on this thread, it would appear that they'd accept feature requests with patches to inline.module
Comment #6
sunTrial and error.
Comment #7
he_who_shall_not_be_named commentedThe img for drupal 6.x version is incomparable different than inline. Try it yourself. :)