Closed (fixed)
Project:
Project
Version:
5.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Releases
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
28 Jun 2007 at 21:40 UTC
Updated:
4 Oct 2007 at 07:41 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
I was trying to explain to someone how to figure out which release points to which branch in CVS and realized it's not very intuitive.
When looking at a release all we see is:
Download: calendar-5.x-1.4.tar.gz
Size: 33.08 KB
md5_file hash: 38589f210a60dc02c37ddbdf110f504f
First released: March 10, 2007 - 20:11
Last updated: March 10, 2007 - 20:15
It would be nice to also have
Revision Control Identifier (tag/branch): DRUPAL-5--1-4
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #5 | 155438_project_release_cvs_tag.patch_2.txt | 1.32 KB | dww |
| #4 | 91195_cvs.patch_2_0.txt | 2.74 KB | dww |
| #2 | 155438_project_release_cvs_tag.patch.txt | 1.28 KB | dww |
Comments
Comment #1
dwwwe already have that for branches:
http://drupal.org/node/105562
Nightly development snapshot from HEAD
but i agree this would be nice for tags, too.
Comment #2
dwwComment #3
dwwNow installed on s.d.o. For example: http://scratch.drupal.org/node/162364
Please suggest better wording if you're so inclined. ;)
Comment #4
dwwHere's another version with more CVS-specific text:
"Official release from CVS tag", etc...
Comment #5
dwweek, sorry, wrong patch...
Comment #6
gregglesI think we should leave it non RCS specific, right?
(Official|Development) release from version control system (tag | branch) X
Comment #7
hunmonk commentedagree w/ greg, especially since we're heading in the direction of versioncontrol_api...
Comment #8
dwwThing is, there are _many_ places in project* that directly check for cvs.module first (just grep for "project_use_cvs"). Until we're actively porting project* to versioncontrol* and untangling the CVS-isms, it's silly to try to make this one particular string different. We don't even have enough experience yet with versioncontrol* to know the "clean" way to solve this problem right now.
Comment #9
drewish commentedi'm with dww, don't bother fixing one spot until the wholesale replacement starts.
changes look sane. i tested it out on both tags and branches and it looks good to me.
Comment #10
dwwCommitted to HEAD and installed on d.o.
Comment #11
gregglesThat seems reasonable to me - thanks very much, guys!
Comment #12
(not verified) commented