Comments

cthiebault’s picture

The git clone command in you description is wrong, use this one instead:
git clone http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/delta/1674202.git domain_access_entity

Automatic review

Check errors from http://ventral.org/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxdelta1674202git

Manual review

  • domain_entity.module, line 494: duplicate array key 'display'.
  • domain_entity.admin.inc, line 23, 52: typo 'wich'
  • domain_entity.admin.inc, line 75: typo 'defaut'
  • domain_entity.admin.inc, line 157: typo 'entites'
gellweiler’s picture

I can't go give you full review, because I'm not comfortable with DNS, but i noticed that your module doesn't contain documentation files and that you work on a master branch you should work on a version branch. See this.

killerpoke’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » killerpoke
killerpoke’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work

Hey delta!

I just reviewed your projects and I have found some issues:

> Code-check failed: http://ventral.org/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxdelta1674202git
> As already mentioned: It appears you are working in the "master" branch in git. You should really be working in a version specific branch. The most direct documentation on this is Moving from a master branch to a version branch. For additional resources please see the documentation about release naming conventions and creating a branch in git.
> Please take a moment to make your README.txt follow the guidelines for in-project documentation.
> you don't have to specific "project" in the .info-file, since this is set automaticly
> Your directory-name must match your project_name. You should consider using "domain_entity" as directory-name.
> It's maybe just me, but it's really hard to read your code. You maybe should read the coding standards

I'm going to set the status to "needs work", at least because of the directory name (enabling the module only works, if you rename the folder)

killerpoke’s picture

Assigned: killerpoke » Unassigned

Hey delta!

I just reviewed your projects and I have found some issues:

> Code-check failed: http://ventral.org/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxdelta1674202git
> As already mentioned: It appears you are working in the "master" branch in git. You should really be working in a version specific branch. The most direct documentation on this is Moving from a master branch to a version branch. For additional resources please see the documentation about release naming conventions and creating a branch in git.
> Please take a moment to make your README.txt follow the guidelines for in-project documentation.
> you don't have to specific "project" in the .info-file, since this is set automaticly
> Your directory-name must match your project_name. You should consider using "domain_entity" as directory-name.
> It's maybe just me, but it's really hard to read your code. You maybe should read the coding standards

I'm going to set the status to "needs work", at least because of the directory name (enabling the module only works, if you rename the folder)

klausi’s picture

Status: Needs work » Closed (won't fix)

Closing due to lack of activity. Feel free to reopen if you are still working on this application.

theruslan’s picture

Status: Closed (won't fix) » Needs review

I guess we should actualize this issue in accordance to rising amount of drupal commerce websites using subdomains.
What's the situation right now?
What kind of help needed?

PA robot’s picture

We are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)

Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.

delta’s picture

I just fixed the last opened issue http://drupal.org/node/1964158
And fixed a lot of formatting problem.
Help is needed in testing and reviewing.
@Ruslan_SM if you use this module, please post a review here.

Thanks

delta’s picture

Formatting looks clean now :
http://ventral.org/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxdelta1674202git-7x-1x

Edit: master branch has been removed too

delta’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

fix git command

delta’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

Update module description

delta’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

Update module description

delta’s picture

Issue tags: +PAreview: review bonus

adding PAReview: review bonus

delta’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

Reference issue to have a parreview tag.

delta’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » delta
delta’s picture

Title: Domain Access Entity » [D7] Domain Access Entity
klausi’s picture

Assigned: delta » stborchert
Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community
Issue tags: -PAreview: review bonus

manual review:

  1. domain_entity_install(): do not juggle with module weights as that is very unreliable and prone to errors. Use hook_module_implements_alter() instead if you must run before another hook.
  2. You use a lot of static db_select() calls, you might want to use db_query() instead? See http://drupal.org/node/310075
  3. I think you should also delete the domain_entity_allowed_entity_types_backup variable on hook_uninstall()?

But otherwise looks RTBC to me. Removing review bonus tag, you can add it again if you have done another 3 reviews of other projects.

Assigning to stBorchert as he might have time to take a final look at this.

delta’s picture

Thanks

1) I do not need this execution order anymore. removed in my last commit.
2) That's fixed by my last commit .
3) This variable is created the time of a batch and is always deleted at the end of the batch.

delta’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

update module notes

delta’s picture

Issue tags: +PAreview: review bonus

add review bonus

delta’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

Add review links

klausi’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Fixed

no objections for more than a week, so ...

Thanks for your contribution, delta!

I updated your account to let you promote this to a full project and also create new projects as either a sandbox or a "full" project.

Here are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:

You can find lots more contributors chatting on IRC in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and get involved!

Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.

Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.

klausi’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

add review links

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Anonymous’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

r