Needs work
Project:
Geofield
Version:
7.x-2.x-dev
Component:
User interface
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
12 Jan 2013 at 21:17 UTC
Updated:
2 Feb 2013 at 15:06 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file

Comments
Comment #1
IWasBornToWin commentedActually just noticed exposed filter isn't working if user changes the distance then clicks "apply", maybe because the blank field isn't being filled in? Buy again, shouldn't need blank field. I'm changing title of this issue
Comment #2
IWasBornToWin commented?
Comment #3
IWasBornToWin commentedWould really appreciate an answer. I'm currently out of commission after attempting to rebuild my views.
Thanks
Comment #4
IWasBornToWin commentedI expect you will have an issue with me changing the priority. But hopefully no more than I have an issue with getting an answer, sorry. Would really appreciate some help. Thanks
Comment #5
IWasBornToWin commentedBump
Comment #6
mototribe commentedI was running into the same issue:
when selecting the "current user" as the origin point it shows the first page of the view correctly (in my case of other users closeby).
However, when I click to the next page it's all incorrect, showing random users from all over the place.
Or if I change the radius the same thing happens.
Also, I wouldn't expect the exposed filter for the "from" field to show. Or at least populate it with the current user's location and then allow overwriting it.
When I use "Geocoded Location" as the "origin point" it works fine. I'll probably just use ?field_geofield_distance[origin]= to pass in the location of the
current user as a work around until this page has been fixed.
Comment #7
IWasBornToWin commentedAny help here please?
Comment #8
Brandonian commented@iwasborntowin, here's a quick patch that fixes the problem at hand. I haven't committed it yet because I'm not sure it's the best long-term solution for the module. The proximity element that comes bundled with geofield was originally conceived as a way to elegantly work with View's exposed filters, and as we've started to implement the widget itself with our proximity views, it's starting to look like we need some more polish on the element end to deal with the wider array of options than I initially expected.
Comment #9
IWasBornToWin commentedThanks, If I apply this patch, rebuild my views....will I need to do it again down the road?