Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
5 Sep 2014 at 09:58 UTC
Updated:
30 Jul 2015 at 15:34 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
t-loplease include the git clone command in the issue
I also found some issues using pareveiw here:
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxgleek2282655git
Comment #2
t-loComment #3
umar-ahmad commentedComment #4
umar-ahmad commentedComment #5
umar-ahmad commented@T-lo thanks. I've worked on most of the issues reported by pareview.sh.
The ones left are either the 80 character limit (which is only in the documentation) or are things which don't seem very alarming. Please have a look again.
Comment #6
umar-ahmad commentedComment #7
PA robot commentedWe are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)
Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #8
gaurav.pahuja commentedCommand that you mentioned is incorrect. Correct command to clone the code would be
git clone --branch 7.x-1.x http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/gleek/2282655.git flux_pocketComment #9
rashid_786 commentedHi Umar,
Thanks for contributing, Below is my feedback:
Automated review still showing lots of errors:
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxgleek2282655git
Git clone command that you mentioned above doesn't seem to be correct one.
git clone --branch 7.x-1.x gleek@git.drupal.org:sandbox/gleek/2282655.git flux_pocketcan you please check it.
Comment #10
gaurav.pahuja commentedAutomated Review
No.
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxgleek2282655git
Best practice issues identified by pareview.sh / drupalcs / coder. Please don't copy/paste all of the results unless they are short. If there are a
lot, then post a link to the automated review and mention that problems should be addressed.
Manual Review
href="https://www.drupal.org/node/2181737">README Template
.The starred items (*) are fairly big issues and warrant going back to Needs Work. Items marked with a plus sign (+) are
important and should be addressed before a stable project release. The rest of the comments in the code walkthrough are
recommendations.
Comment #11
umar-ahmad commentedfixing git clone link
Comment #12
umar-ahmad commentedHello Gaurav, Rashid
Thanks for the review
I've updated the said changes in the latest commit#50
Fixes involve:
Note:The module works with
fluxservice 7.x-1.x-dev, as this will most likely be the released version soon. Installing throughdrushinstalls the wrong version of fluxservice. Even adding specific entry ininfofile forfluxservice (7.x-1.x-dev)leads to wrong result. Patches are welcome for the case.Few of the errors in paraview.sh are still present. The reason is that they are not very critical. The warnings related to 80 character limits cannot be fixed, as it will break the markdown format of the documentation
Comment #13
umar-ahmad commentedRefer to #12
Comment #14
samir_mankar commentedThanks for contributing, Below is my feedback:
Automated review
PAreview is still showing lots of errors, check the below links :
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxgleek2282655git.
Manual Review
Individual user account
Yes: Follows the guidelines for individual user accounts.
No duplication
Yes: Does not cause module duplication and fragmentation.
Master Branch
Yes/No: Follows the guidelines for master branch.
Licensing
No. LICENSE.txt is there inisde the code.: Follows the licensing requirements
3rd party code
No. Third party files are placed inside module.: Follows the guidelines for 3rd party code.
README.txt/README.md
Yes: Follows the guidelines for in-project documentation and the README Template.
Code long/complex enough for review
Yes: Follows the guidelines for project length and complexity.
Secure code
Not sure. Need to test this module on some Vanilla Drupal installation. If "no", list security issues identified.
Coding style & Drupal API usage
Please correct the above error, then go through the @PA robot 's #7 comment above.
Follow the guidelines at Review Bonus to get your project reviewed.
Comment #15
klausiThe automated review is not a blocker, please do a real manual review.
Comment #16
SolidOpinion commentedPlease see automated report and fix errors
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxivinco1197408git
manual review
there are no implementation of hook_help()
Comment #17
umar-ahmad commentedHi!
I think you've got a wrong paraview link there. The correct project review by paraview is
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxgleek2282655git
There are mistakes present there, but I've chosen not to address them currently. Please refer to the last point of Comment #12 for the reason.
Reply to the
hook_help():Fluxpocket is a module which merely acts as an integration service for the fluxservices project (https://www.drupal.org/project/fluxservice). It integrates the Pocket API with the fluxservice module without exposing any end user functionality. Thus, it does not require specific hooks, as they will have to be defined in the fluxservice itself.
Comment #18
crizAs I know this was a successful GSoC project mentored by derhasi, so I'm sure that the code is fine.
However, here my review:
Manual Review
I tested this module using latest version of the fluxkraft distribution. Installation worked as intended, including the composer-manager update to download the third-party library. I authenticated my pocket account and added a test rule that created an entity when I saved a new url using pocket. Worked like a charme. Great job!
I really would like to see this module having a full release!
This review uses the Project Application Review Template.
Comment #19
cweagansThanks for your contribution!
I updated your account so you can promote this to a full project and also create new projects as either a sandbox or a "full" project.
Here are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:
You can find lots more contributors chatting on IRC in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and stay involved!
Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.
Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.