Closed (won't fix)
Project:
FileField Image
Version:
6.x-1.0-beta1
Component:
User interface
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
30 Jun 2008 at 11:14 UTC
Updated:
21 Apr 2009 at 07:28 UTC
Comments
Comment #1
jpetso commentedYup, valid requests probably. There are currently a few hurdles to overcome still until additional fields like custom title or longdesc can be added, but I guess making alt texts (aka description) empty by default and requiring them to be filled in might be a good idea. Is the 80 characters limit that you mention part of official guidelines, or just an estimate that you came up with?
Comment #2
jpetso commentedAh ok, read up on the above-linked issue now. Still need to read up on the official accessibility documents, though.
Also, I noticed that restricting texts to 80 characters might be odd if another widget (like the generic file edit widget) had a longer text entered before, that text then wouldn't be able to stay as is if the generic widget is afterwards replaced by an image widget.
Perhaps allow longer texts if they've been longer than 80 characters before - that way, if image widgets are consequently used then the alt can't be longer than 80 characters, and can stay the way the were before if the user had entered something longer and widget priority changes afterwards. Does that sound like a workable solution for the length issue?
Comment #3
henrrrik commentedThat sounds like a good solution.
The 80 characters limit isn't specified in WCAG 1.0 (it only says "short"), but has become an informal best practice rule and the Cynthia Says validator imposes that limit: http://www.cynthiasays.com/About%20Reports/Alt%20Quality.htm
Comment #4
henrrrik commentedAnother great thing to have would be optional default alt and title text with support for tokens. I've created a patch for ImageField that does this (#277637: Default alt and title text with token support). If you think it's a good idea I can give porting it to FileField Image a go.
Comment #5
scottrigbyA caption would be lovely – I'm not deft enough to propose a patch, but I'll volunteer to test it :)
Comment #6
drewish commentedsubscribing
Comment #7
mgiffordadding accessibility tag
Comment #8
jpetso commentedThis module is now phased out in favor of FileField/ImageField 6.x-3.0. All issues are "won't fix" because the module is essentially dead. Please have a look at the project page for some explanations.