Closed (fixed)
Project:
Documentation
Component:
Correction/Clarification
Priority:
Critical
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
11 Aug 2008 at 11:56 UTC
Updated:
3 Jun 2009 at 11:30 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
j.somers commentedComment #2
Noyz commentedComment #3
Noyz commentedChanged the component to reflect the new component categorization. See http://drupal.org/node/301443
Comment #4
j.somers commentedI was advised to change the status back to 'patch (code needs review)' so someone could review the patch and commit it, if OK.
Comment #5
gpk commentedI think this actually just needs someone with the relevant privileges to edit the http://drupal.org/coding-standards page.
To make it really easy for someone to do that, I'll re-iterate what needs doing here:
1. In the section PHP Code tags, the link for the "no ?> needed at the end of modules" discussion needs changing from
http://lists.drupal.org/archives/drupal-devel/2005-08/msg00648.htmltohttp://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/2005-August/008043.html2. In the Naming Conventions section, subheading Class Names, change
to
lowerCamelCase3. Then comment http://drupal.org/coding-standards#comment-1004329 can be deleted.
Also changed title of this issue to try to attract attention!
Comment #6
add1sun commentedcoolio, thanks for the breakdown. currently the coding standards page is generated from CVS, so you can either create a patch for it, or if you have a CVS account you can commit the changes yourself. The page itself needs to be manually updated from the server, so the changes won't appear until we get infra to do that. :-/
I've made an issue to make this a regular handbook page as well: #306569: Make coding standards a regular book page
Comment #7
gpk commentedAhhh, my fault for clouding the issue then. The patch is aready there in the original post!
Please treat #5 as a verbose description of what the patch does then!
Patch applies OK, all looks good, hence RTBC.
Comment #8
junedkazi commentedno ?> needed at the end of modules link under PHP Code Tags leads to a page not found .
Is the patch mentioned above applied to the page or not ?
Thanks
Juned Kazi
Comment #9
junedkazi commentedRFC 2606 link under Example URLs also leads to a page not found
Thanks
Juned Kazi
Comment #10
add1sun commentedFixed the RFC and PHP tag links. The studlyCaps issue will get addressed when the #260220: OOP standards get redone here shortly.
Comment #12
gpk commentedHave fixed the studlyCaps issue which is generating comment on the page itself, obviously OOP standards need a bit more info, only just seen the link above at #10.
Also noting here that the link to the PHP tag link was fixed (#10) by removing it; the discussion referenced is of little import to the coding standards page itself.