With bluemarine as default theme, do the following:
1) Go to admin/themes/settings
2) Check off all boxes in "Display post information on"
3) save configuration
4) Go to admin/themes/settings/bluemarine
5) Make no changes and hit "save configuration"
6) Navigate back to admin/themes/settings
7) Notice the check boxes are in "Display post information on" are no longer checked.
Also, try this:
1) Go to admin/themes/settings
2) In the "Toggle display" group, check off "user pictures in posts" and "user pictures in comments"
3) save configuration
4) go to admin/themes/settings/bluemarine
5) In the "Toggle display" group, check off "user pictures in posts" and "user pictures in comments"
6) save configuration
7) Go back to admin/themes/settings
8) notice "user pictures in posts" and "user pictures in comments" are no longer checked
9) Check them again
10) save configuration
11) go back to admin/themes/settings/bluemarine
12) notice "user pictures in posts" and "user pictures in comments" are no longer checked
Comments
Comment #1
chx commentedThanks for you detailed bug report! It helped me a lot.
Comment #2
Steve Dondley commentedNo problem. Thanks for all your work. I wouldn't know where to begin troubleshooting the new forms API. An aside: this new forms API has me a little worried. Seems like it's creating an awful lot of bugs, and ones that might be difficult to spot. Are these things all going to get ironed out?
Comment #3
chx commentedYes! Bugfest next week in Amsterdam! If you can't make it, don't worry, you can participate via IRC or other means. Stay tuned for announcements.
Comment #4
(not verified) commentedComment #5
Thomas Sewell commentedThis had been marked as fixed and closed, but there is no mention of a patch or any fix details in the comments and I am still experiencing this issue with the most recent cvs release as of October 28th, 2005.
Comment #6
Tobias Maier commentedlook at http://drupal.org/node/34170 this is also a post about this problem
read this and then mark this as duplicate...
Comment #7
Thomas Sewell commentedThanks for the pointer.
Comment #8
Steve Dondley commentedWell, technically, this node, 33700, came before the other node so this node is the original and the other is a duplicate.