Biblio, CCK dependency/support

janusman - May 20, 2009 - 19:09
Project:Millennium Integration
Version:6.x-2.x-dev
Component:Code
Category:task
Priority:critical
Assigned:Unassigned
Status:active
Description

Version 1.x depended on Biblio module, and the current 2.x-DEV version does not.

I am not so convinced the module should require Biblio again, since IMO Biblio is reproducing a lot of functionality from CCK/Views; my gut feeling is that Millennium module could *support* it in a basic way (allow importing into Biblio-type nodes) but not at all depend on it.

To be fair, Millennium module 2.x-DEV is also reproducing a little bit of Biblio, but just the store-and-show-bibliographic-data part.

I would prefer to move 2.x into requiring CCK; then we'd have views & more automatically.

I need to read issues like #397332: Conversion to CCK data model. Post more issues or links here.

#2

janusman - May 20, 2009 - 19:37

rjerome mentions biblio probably won't be CCK until D7: http://drupal.org/node/397332#comment-1344572

#3

janusman - June 16, 2009 - 22:16

Useful link for creating CCK fields upon module installation:

http://drewish.com/node/134
http://drewish.com/node/118

#4

janusman - October 30, 2009 - 22:28
Priority:normal» critical

Tagging this as critical; I think this is the next thing to take care of (whether using CCK or Biblio) in order to gain Views and other support.

I'm leaning towards CCK instead of Biblio.

#5

tituomin - November 2, 2009 - 13:53

Not very familiar with Biblio. However, CCK seems to be a safe bet, with the D7 core integration and stuff. So maybe I would vote for CCK.

 
 

Drupal is a registered trademark of Dries Buytaert.