Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org project ownership
Component:
Ownership transfer
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
21 Aug 2009 at 11:35 UTC
Updated:
9 May 2014 at 00:31 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
greg.harveyOk, 20 weeks and no reply - I think this constitutes "Abandoned". ;-)
Can I please take over this module so our D6 port of this can go ahead and we can add block titles as a feature?
Comment #2
avpadernoI'm changing the title as it should be, and moving back the report to the project queue.
If you want to take over a module, it is not enough to open a support request, but you should also contact the maintainer as reported in the page about dealing with abandoned projects.
I am going to send a message to the current maintainer, and leave a message in IRC between 4 hours.
Comment #3
greg.harveyThe page you refer to is this, I presume?
http://drupal.org/node/251466
It says:
It doesn't say "you should also contact the maintainer"... It says *if* they have an IRC nick (and this user does not) then you might try pinging them in IRC. But I couldn't. Because they don't. Sure, I didn't mention the module name in the title, but *20 weeks*?? Come on... =/
Anyways, I guess we'll leave it for another 2 weeks, but we did also try and email the developer, *months* ago, and got no response - so this is clearly abandoned, as are all the other projects against this user's account. He seems to post some dev code (if that) - probably enough to get things working for his specific case - then disappear. Take a look at his other issue queues.
Comment #4
catchI've never been aware of any communication being required other than an issue. Not everyone has contact form enabled, not every project node owner is the active developer, and you can't go e-mailing everyone with cvs access if that's the case.
Comment #5
greg.harveyLink to module, for reference: http://drupal.org/project/image_title
Comment #6
avpadernoI take that the part reporting about contacting the author by IRC should be taken as a suggestion of contacting the current maintainer.
In no case a project has been passed to another user without first trying to contact the current maintainer; the same is true for projects that have been marked as abandoned.
Comment #7
avpadernoIn the specific case
Comment #8
greg.harveyI said in #3, we did try to email him from the contact form. Ages ago.
Comment #9
greg.harveyActually, reviewed my emails and found a reply from Deepak, dated 21st Oct 2008 (more than a year ago) saying he was away for 15 days but would commit asap. He never did! He also never replied to subsequent emails.
So there have been ample efforts to contact him.
Comment #10
avpadernoI sent an email to the current maintainer.
Comment #11
greg.harveyThanks kiamlaluno. Though I still think he's more than had his chances already...! =P
@dksdev01, assuming you do actually make an appearance, please be honest about your ability to maintain this module. We asked you in October of 2008 if you would review and commit our D6 port. You said you would and didn't. I won't presume to guess why, but if you simply don't have time, please at least agree to making me a co-maintainer so *someone* is looking after this module! It's no good to anyone if you come along and say "don't worry, I'll do it next week..." then disappear off the face of the planet like you did last time... This is a good potential module and people are queueing up to use it and improve upon it, but it's dead as long as it doesn't have an active maintainer. =(
Comment #12
dksdev01 commentedSorry greg, I was extremely busy with my current work from last 1 year so I couldn't make any update, as I was building own Development Team. I am hopefully back now .. and also going to attend Drupalcon this year.
I am checking issue queue and will keep you updated and to work together to maintain in long term and give people a great module to use.
I request to community to give me another chance as I am still to learn a lot of things from this great Drupal community.
thanks, Deepak
Comment #13
greg.harveyHi Deepak,
There's nothing wrong with being busy. There's also nothing wrong with sharing the maintenance of a module. I'm too busy to look after all my modules, so when someone says "hey, need some help?" I lay out the ground rules and give them CVS access. I would urge you to do the same.
What p*sses people off is disappearing for months on end and not looking after module, and *NOT* sharing the maintenance even though people are volunteering to help! THAT'S annoying. It's 18 months since we first saw Image Title and 15 months since we presented a working D6 port, and not a single commit, in spite of email saying you would? I hope this won't happen again - mainly because it's totally unnecessary.
If you add me to CVS I will happily look after the Drupal 6 branch. Up to you, for now, but my CVS name is 'rareface' ... (don't ask!)
=)
Comment #14
avpadernoAs the current maintainer has replied here, I am moving the report back to the project queue.
@dksdev01: greg.harvey is interested in porting the module to Drupal 6, and I would suggest to make him co-maintainer; you would still be able to commit code in CVS, and you could continue to develop the module when you have more time. Being in two to develop the code is surely a big help, and the module can make step forward.
Considering that he had 15 month to debug his code, I would think that making him co-maintainer is surely something to consider.
Comment #15
greg.harveyIndeed. That D6 port has been production live here for over a year:
http://www.defaqto.com/
And I'd like to add block title support. =)
Comment #16
avpadernoEven better: one year of test is something to consider.
Comment #17
dksdev01 commentedHi All,
Drupal port is committed now. http://drupal.org/node/683100
@greg.harvey I tried to give you cvs access but drupal says "rareface is not a valid user on this site"
This was given by you..
I will take good care of this module going ahead.
thanks, Deepak
Comment #18
dksdev01 commentedComment #19
greg.harveyAh, sorry - seems it wants the d.o username, not CVS (I forgot that) e.g. greg.harvey ...
Comment #21
greg.harveyOk, so here we are, two months on. Maintainer appears after a year in the wilderness, applies a few patches, promises to do better, etc. etc. Then nothing. I'm back here again because I found this comment: http://drupal.org/node/221854#comment-2732272
So I checked it out, and sure enough: #714372: D6 port doesn't seem to work properly
Two months without a whisper, in an issue queue with just TWO open issues? And a support request unanswered, not even so much as a "I'm kinda busy right now", for over a month? Clearly the module is not being maintained.
I really don't know what we have to do to get this module properly maintained. You won't take it off this guy, he flat refuses to have co-maintainers (see #17) but he doesn't maintain it either - should I just start a new project? At this rate it looks like you'll force me to. It's no good having a maintainer that only shows up periodically when one of the Drupal webmasters lights a fire under him by email, promises to change the world and then disappears again. That doesn't help anyone. I've already talked about this in #13 in this very thread.
This issue is becoming a farce. Meanwhile people are using nasty template hacks and custom code in their own modules to work around functionality this module can and does solve already! If I wasn't trying to keep Drupal.org as clean as possible, I'd have started a new project with my code ages ago. I'm doing the right thing here, offering to help out with an existing module and it seems futile.
Comment #22
catchGiven #17 looks like an attempt was made to give CVS access, there seems to have been a mixup with usernames, and there's been no followup, I've gone ahead and given Greg Harvey (greg.harvey) CVS access to image_title. I'm not sure what else needs to be done here, so marking 'Needs Work'.
Comment #23
greg.harveyThanks. Deepak has re-appeared again now btw, I see from the other issue, but not made any comment or attempt to contact anyone about this? I guess he saw this thread sparking up again and dealt with the issue queue, perhaps not, perhaps it was coincidence (though I'm not a big believer in that).
Either way, I don't really want to work crossed-purposes - I'm a bit in "no mans land" as to what to do. Being an "unofficial" co-maintainer without buy-in from the actual maintainer is no good, because I don't know what he's doing and he doesn't know what I'm doing. There's no way we can work to improve or even bug-fix the module if I'm frozen out. In a case like this, me having CVS access doesn't really achieve anything, because I daren't use it! (Though I do appreciate catch jumping in here and bumping the status.)
The module needs either:
1. Myself and Deepak to work together in a meaningful way as co-maintainers
2. Deepak to start being a proper maintainer, watch his issue queue and at least respond in a timely manor and plan future development
3. A new maintainer entirely (if it were me, I'd immediately seek a co-maintainer anyway)
As I noted before, I don't care which of the above happens. Frankly, I'd much prefer option 2, because I don't have much time either so if it doesn't involve me then all the better, but history keeps repeating itself and Deepak doesn't seem very interested in option 1. =(
Anyway, onwards and upwards...
Comment #24
avpadernoAs I can see, there is nothing more we can do for this report; greg.harvey has been made co-maintainer. For further development of the module, maintainer or co-maintainer should take a decision.
Comment #25
greg.harveyWell, as of now:
- there is no contact from the maintainer
- I am not the maintainer and don't know what the maintainer is actually doing
- the maintainer is NOT maintaining the module effectively
- there is no development plan and I cannot make one
- the Drupal.org webmasters seem to be unable/unwilling to do anything further
So it's back to plan B - new project that we can maintain properly.
This situation is crazy, but there's nothing more I can do here. This is the d.o webmasters adding to the Drupal module soup through inaction. Sad, but there you have it.
Fixed, this issue is not. Dead, it clearly is, along with the Image Title project.
Comment #26
dksdev01 commentedHi All,
Just to keep informed, I am doing my best to maintain this module as responding in timely manner to issue queue and query of user. So there is no need to further talk and greg also fine with that as per his #23 comment. I just do not replied here due to lack of time but module issue queue is updated always.
thanks, D