Hi, I've included a CHANGELOG.txt file for each branch (as result of a short conv in IRC with webchick) that should be updated from now on. I've included previous CVS operations (removing small issues) in the files.

Just as a reminder: Commit messages - providing history and credit, includes changelog recommendations.

Does not worth create the issue for the 6.x-1.x branch.

Comments

dave reid’s picture

Is a changelog really necessary for this project? We have CVS commit messages and cvs.drupal.org to look at history. I'm just wondering what we gain in this project by adhering to the formality.

rfay’s picture

IMO a changelog that just shows new examples being added is probably useful. Sometimes, especially with a module like this, you might check in on it every year or two and have no idea what's new.

dave reid’s picture

Ok, having only major changes and additions sounds good. I tend to break my commits into small and manageable sizes, and I don't like to put every. single. one. of. them. into CHANGELOG.txt files. Especially if it's things like fixing coding standards or small trivial changes. :)

ilo’s picture

I have populated CHANGELOG with current cvs commit messages according to each branch, but we can remove some of them if you want. I agree that being so instructive about any minor change as sun does may render changelog difficult to read, specially if module is being under constant changes and reviews as examples module is being now, but this is a something that will finish soon, once the module finds a more stable situation.

rfay’s picture

Status: Active » Fixed

IMO this isn't terribly important.

However, my practice is to add the commit message to the CHANGELOG.txt within each module as I do it. I helps to keep that history.

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.