Hey,

I followed the instructions (to the best of my knowledge) and installed the Deployment module and connected two Drupal environments. Then, I started testing individual deployments for nodes.So, I added a page, then deployed it, and the Deployment module said it worked. In fact, I could see in the progress bar it recognized the correct content that needed to be transferred to the other Drupal environment. On the log, it says there was a successful transfer (without any message).

Is this a typical result of something I forgot to do during installation? Please let me know!

Thanks

Comments

mlncn’s picture

mlncn commented

Is there a 'but' coming in this? After all those success messages, why do you say it didn't work ;-)

Looked at admin/content/node and filtered by Page on the receiving site to double-check?

pcas00’s picture

pcas00 commented

There were a couple of module issues that I had to fix and it appears to be working.

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous (not verified) commented

I'm experiencing the same problem basically: Everything is set up according to documentation and deployment finishes with a "Succesful" message, also logs accordingly. But the nodes never end up on the live server, neither new nodes nor updated nodes. I'm kinda lost. :(

pcas00, can you elaborate what modules issues you ended up haveing to fix to make it work?

apotek’s picture

apotek commented
Category: support » bug

We had the same issue, but with deploying a cck type and with deploying taxonomy.

Everything on the sending server made it look like all was working well. But none of the deployed content could be found on the receiving server.

Our fix was to enable clean urls on the receiving server.

The deploy module appears to be relying on some non-Drupal API or request handling... perhaps this is a fault of the services API? In a well-built module, it should be utterly inconsequential if a user has clean urls enabled or not.

apotek’s picture

apotek commented

I'll bet this turns out to be a duplicate of http://drupal.org/node/526936

Unfortunately, it looks like the Services module needs a fix for its request handling so it doesn't rely solely on clean urls.

giorgio79’s picture

giorgio79 commented
Status: Active » Closed (duplicate)

yep it does look like a dupe of #526936: Find best way to proceeding with 6.x-1.x