CVS edit link for John_Kenney

I am the co-sponsor of a new module called NodeTable and am interested to help prepare some of the documentation for the project at http://drupal.org/project/nodetable.

I am not a programmer, so I will not be contributing code. Only documentation.

Thank you.

Comments

sun’s picture

Status: Postponed (maintainer needs more info) » Closed (won't fix)

You do not need a CVS account to contribute documentation.

john.kenney’s picture

I need a CVS account to write and manage the project page. I am not able to edit it with my current permissions.

Since this is my assigned responsibility as worked out among the various sponsors and maintainers of this new module, I cannot perform my duty unless I can edit the page.

Since yesterday, I have been approved by the maintainer to join the team. http://drupal.org/node/773284

Please approve my request so I can get to work on this.

Thank you.

john.kenney’s picture

Status: Closed (won't fix) » Active

changed status back to 'active'.

sun’s picture

Status: Active » Postponed (maintainer needs more info)

That's not really a compelling reason. It sounds like you want to write extensive documentation on the project page. However, the proper location for documentation is the handbook on drupal.org -- handbook pages can be created and edited by everyone, no special permissions required.

john.kenney’s picture

sorry, i'm not getting what the problem is.

because i am a good writer and know the new module inside and out, i am tasked to write and maintain this page: http://drupal.org/project/nodetable

except that i cannot edit that page, so i cannot do this - and that means someone else on the team has to do that work and that is not what we have agreed in terms of assignments.

i am also likely to write additional documentation of the type you describe, but i know i do not need special permissions to do that and that is not the issue before us here.

if there is another way to grant me permission to edit the /nodetable project page, that would be fine, too. i just need access to edit this page on an on-going basis.

avpaderno’s picture

What sun is saying is that a CVS account is given to whom needs to commit code in Drupal.org repository; to create documentation is not necessary to have a CVS account.

michelle’s picture

All that's needed for you to edit that page is for you to be made the author of it. You don't need a CVS account for that. If you get the current owner to approve that change, any maintainer can switch it over.

Michelle

john.kenney’s picture

right, i understand this in the general case - cvs accounts are generally for the purpose of code writers and the developers normally are responsible for writing/maintaining the project page. And this explains why so many project pages are so unhelpful.

but in this instance, we would like to have someone (i.e., me) who is more skilled at writing to be responsible for the project page - as well as some of the other documentation. since i cannot contribute code to the project, this is seen as a reasonable split of responsibilities.

i am not talking here about writing a 20-volume piece of documentation and jamming it onto the project page, so perhaps i am describing this request wrong. i am talking about writing the project page as part of my general responsibilities on the module for documentation. it will be a project page like other projects pages - though i hope more informative than the norm (without being overly long).

you are saying your procedures are not flexible enough to allow that. i don't get that.

having been thru one other situation like this on d.o. before - like the time i tried to create a doc page with an HTML table in it - sometimes it feels like process completely overwhelms common sense.

john.kenney’s picture

@#7

ok. i think he tried that and didn't seem to be able to do it. can you be more specific how this is done?

we are talking about the actual project page here. not a general documentation page.

thank you.

john.kenney’s picture

@#7

the maintainer has checked again.

he says: "there is no way to add you as a co-maintainer of the module without you having a CVS account"

he asks for more detailed instructions how to accomplish this, please.

avpaderno’s picture

ok. i think he tried that and didn't seem to be able to do it. can you be more specific how this is done?

we are talking about the actual project page here. not a general documentation page.

What Michelle means is that one user a site maintainer needs to make you the author of the project page. In that way, you can edit the project page without to need any CVS account.

john.kenney’s picture

@#11

ok, great. that's what i need.

but we don't know how to do it.

can one of you please provide more detailed instructions how to do this?

thank you.

michelle’s picture

Just get the maintainer to say he authorizes transferring the project page over to you and we can make you the author of the page.

Michelle

amariotti’s picture

I authorize John_Kenney to be made the maintainer of the project. Thanks for helping us sort this out.

john.kenney’s picture

alright. thank you. that helps.

he will come on the thread and do that.

he and other actual maintainers will still have access or it becomes then only me who can edit it?

---

he beat me to it!

sun’s picture

I've changed the owner of the project node.

However, I also just read #773376: Interested in this module? Please help us test it. ... "it works like that" -- so why is this a separate module? And not a patch or co-maintainer request for http://drupal.org/project/tablemanager ?

john.kenney’s picture

thank you for changing the ownership. i'm not sure exactly what that means, but i see that i now have an edit tab. we'll work out any other implications.

as to your question about why: do you want the long version or the short?

best to please refer to this thread: http://drupal.org/node/772790 and the threads it references.

it has been a long and incredibly time consuming saga - which partly explains why i might sound aggravated here. if so, i apologize for that.

sun’s picture

Status: Postponed (maintainer needs more info) » Fixed

Nice read. Sometimes, I wish we'd also take away projects from maintainers without agreement. :P

I guess this issue is fixed then.

john.kenney’s picture

yes, i have to admit being quite shocked how much deference was shown to the guy earlier on despite the obvious shortcomings. you would have thought there'd be some sort of code of conduct that maintainers sign up. but clearly not.

i really had no idea what would happen this time around. i half expected we would be told to go pound sand as we were before, but thankfully not.

i'm tempted to make an overly forthright comment about my chief lesson learned out of this, but it is probably best kept to myself.

but thanks again for the assistance.

john.kenney’s picture

alright. sorry to be back so soon. but we have an issue already.

how do i add maintainers to the project? like i need to add Andrew back in right now so he can actually manage his part of this.

i understand this is done off a 'CVS Access' tab, but I don't see that.

avpaderno’s picture

I see that amariotti has been added back as co-maintainer.

sun’s picture

oopsie, I forgot to add him. Added him back now, so he has CVS access again.

For now, I guess/hope that you won't need to grant CVS access to further people. If you'll have to do in the future, we're here to help.

john.kenney’s picture

great. thank you for handling this quickly.

yes, we will have at least 1 additional person. he will be applying for CVS access soon - or perhaps has already. per this request: http://drupal.org/node/772866

and can you confirm that there is another person with CVS Access already: zserno

fwiw, this seems an awful lot of work to go thru when we could do it ourselves if i had CVS Access. the reasoning still escapes me. what is the logic here again?

never mind, but please confirm zserno.

thank you.

john.kenney’s picture

ok, so the other guy has applied for CVS account.

so these 3 people should have CVS access for the module:

http://drupal.org/user/491720
http://drupal.org/user/262120
http://drupal.org/user/190427

that should do it for the time being.

thank you.

pobster’s picture

FFS, stop talking about me like these threads are private! I stopped working on Tablemanager because you infuriated me so much that I wanted to see you put your money where your mouth is and actually come up with something yourself.

So... On the contrary, I have absolutely no issue at all with adding your team as co-maintainers to Tablemanager. I just don't like you so much, and so was looking for excuses to blow you off before, that's probably why a few of the things in that original thread are contradictory, I'd simply had enough... I still don't understand why you think a single programmer should have a release schedule for a home grown project - and then to get really angry when I don't have one? Nice... Do you also think I should program in a agile way??? And demanding to view my unreleased code because it's GPL?? You've a funny way of playing the victim...

Anyways, I really don't think there's any reason to have two modules doing exactly the same thing (okay so I've still not put any branch 2 code up yet which *does* create tables as nodes and tbh, I doubt I will any time soon I'm simply too busy) so I suggest merging the two projects. The community should not suffer simply because I think you're a dick. Let me know how you want to proceed, I've no interest in competing - like I said I just don't have the time at the moment for anything other than my smaller projects. I would however (assuming you do wish to merge) appreciate it if you;

1. Start the new release off as 2.x
2. Provide an upgrade path from 1.x (I can do this if you're not interested)
3. Don't make a release straight away, let the community test the codebase first

Pobster

pobster’s picture

Okay I've added;

amariotti
vegantriathlete
zserno

If someone wants to make John the owner of the project node that's fine with me, I too can't see anywhere on the project page where I can change the author?

Thanks,

Pobster

john.kenney’s picture

@#25, @#26

pobster:

i really don't understand the tone you've taken with me or the deep set anger. your endless stream of excuses and constantly changing logic is also tiresome.

you should be aware these latest posts and many of the ones from last fall were carefully pre-coordinated with amariotti - like down to the specific words used - so if you think these views are unique to me, you are incorrect.

both of us have jobs to do and they need to be done using the functionality of your module on production D6 sites - except your code doesn't work on D6. we are trying to get it to work on D6 .

all this crap about not being able to write code on your birthday, the legality of your code, your aversion to co-maintainers, and all this other bullsh*t you've posted has made this harder to do than it needed to be.

andrew and i have both been completely baffled by your responses.

regardless, i appreciate the expression of willingness to work together - even if the offer is made 6 months too late and in an extremely offputting way.

personally, i can't say i am eager to go this route. but i will refer my colleagues to your posts and we'll discuss it. we'll come back with a collective decision. this will probably not be until early next week since it is now saturday.

regards,
john

john.kenney’s picture

if you want to respond to any of comments #25, #26, or #27, please do so on this thread where these comments have been reposted: http://drupal.org/node/772790

as to my request in #24, this request still stands, please.

pobster’s picture

I have no anger against anyone? I only dislike you because of the way you speak to people, you seem to only be able to communicate by speaking down to people and I really don't act well with being treated that way. And as usual you always seem to want to argue? I mean I'm only too happy to oblige but haven't you had enough by now? I know I certainly have...

I'm willing to overlook your attitude as tbh, I really don't care - I told you previously (when we were on good terms) that I would complete Tablemanager but on my own terms, which meant that I wasn't going to start on it right away;

...all this crap about not being able to write code on your birthday

..Amazing... So... This was my only gripe tbh, everything else that came after this was purely just that I didn't want to work with you at all, I'd already made my mind up that I wasn't interested after that. I'm not a software house. That's why I don't have a release schedule. There's nothing you can say to me that will make me work on my birthday. I'm not bothered about your project at all or your deadline. I told you when I could have completed the code but you weren't willing to wait until I could start, that is not my problem - I'm not driven by money, more by goodwill - of which you have absolutely none. I have no aversion to co-maintainers, you took that out of context and it was more that I just had no desire to assist you in any way. Just of note, I do have two co-maintainers on my Imagemenu project.

Look... Enough... I don't like you, but as per this thread - there is no point in having two modules with duplicate functionality, and in providing a release for TM you'll automatically inherit some 400-odd users. That's a good amount of people who will then be testing and using your codebase. That means more to me than money - that the community will benefit. We will not have to work together at all on this, I will not be committing into your branch or answering your issues - you're simply taking over the name, there will be no more interaction between us. Which I'm sure can only be a good thing...

Pobster

john.kenney’s picture

StatusFileSize
new12.62 KB

am i supposed to be able to upload images to this page? i've tried the process repeatedly and am not able to do this.

but i am missing an actual 'attach' button as, for instance appears below on this node.

is it a permissions problem? i've seen numerous other threads with similar problems. http://drupal.org/node/460750

i've attached the image if someone else needs to upload for me.

thank you.

john.kenney’s picture

StatusFileSize
new36.77 KB

@kiamlaluno: thank you for uploading the image. that's very good of you.

i see now i should have made it larger so you can read it better when you click on it (i think it works like that).

i'm attaching larger version if you are able to try again in a spare moment.

i'm sorry to trouble you with it.

thanks again.

john.kenney’s picture

@kiamlaluno: thank you again!

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.