General discussion

Instead of administrators editing spam posts to align with the guidelines, it would be more productive to simply mark a SEO spam post, or SEO reputation management post as spam, and add a reply:

Your post looks like a spam SEO attempt, and have been flagged as spam. Please edit your post, to match the guidelines.

Hi everyone,

I’ve been exploring how to best handle performance for content-heavy sites that rely on visuals and frequent updates, which need to balance:

• Fast load times (lots of images)
• SEO/indexing (ever-changing trend pages)
• Easy editorial workflow (multiple content contributors)

For those of you running Drupal sites with similar needs, what modules or strategies have worked best for image optimization and caching?

This account has been spamming for two weeks now:

https://www.drupal.org/u/prakashhinduja25

After the proprietary Slack app began to be used as a support fork, this forum fell out of the main menu on this site.

If this bug is not currently scheduled to be fixed, where should I report it? And how have key maintainers not noticed?

With a significant number of Canadians being unwilling to travel to the USA right now, in particular LGBTQ+ people, it may be nice to have a Drupalcon in Canada.

I propose Victoria, BC :)

Thoughts?

I've reported a lot of posts which are part of a reputation management scheme where they are trying to bury negative news stories in google searches. The main red flag is putting "their" name in the subject (good for SEO). I've documented many examples here: at simon-smart88/Hinduja_spam on GitHub and you can find more by googling "hinduja site:drupal.org"