Closed (fixed)
Project:
Scheduler
Version:
7.x-1.x-dev
Component:
User interface
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
29 Oct 2013 at 16:55 UTC
Updated:
7 Dec 2013 at 13:20 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
jonathan1055 commentedHere's the patch which does the above, rolled against 1.1+35
Jonathan
Comment #2
jonathan1055 commentedHere is the config page currently

New page (when date popup is not available)

New page (with date popup available)

Comment #3
pfrenssenThis is a good improvement. I also noticed that the descriptions needed an overhaul.
I have replaced the hardcoded links in the descriptions with calls to the l() function to generate the links, so that any alterations done to links by modules and themes are respected.
I was wondering if the following sentence might be improved still. If the popups are already working then the site administrator is likely not interested that this particular feature is depending on the Date module. If the site has been built by someone else the administrator might even not understand what it means.
Comment #4
jonathan1055 commentedThanks for changing the links. I think there must be some conflicting advice on how to have links within a t() function. I followed the rule that suggested keeping the a tag within the main string so that translators have the context for the text of the link available when making the translation, and can alter the entire string in one go. But I am fine with the way you have changed it.
Yes, that sentence can be reduced. But I think having the link to the date popup config page is helpful. How about
Comment #5
pfrenssenSounds good! Committed to 7.x-1.x: a1afb0b. Thanks!
Comment #6
jonathan1055 commentedGreat. The commit is taking time to appear on the project page. Might be a case of #2125405: Not all commits showing up
Comment #7
jonathan1055 commentedThe commit and new dev release are still not showing 3 days after you did the work. Also the front project page seems to be cached as the status of this issue is still showing as yellow 'needs review'. I have reported this case on https://drupal.org/node/2125405#comment-8214387