The module's code could use an update to follow Drupal's coding standards, it's quite messy at the moment.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #2 | nodequeue_extras-n1619400-2.patch | 10.27 KB | jweowu |
| #1 | nodequeue_extras-n1619400.patch | 9.68 KB | damienmckenna |
The module's code could use an update to follow Drupal's coding standards, it's quite messy at the moment.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #2 | nodequeue_extras-n1619400-2.patch | 10.27 KB | jweowu |
| #1 | nodequeue_extras-n1619400.patch | 9.68 KB | damienmckenna |
Comments
Comment #1
damienmckennaThis cleans up the code as much as I could identify.
Comment #2
jweowu commentedI applied this patch and then ran the module through the coder module's review, and made additional fixes based on that.
Please do commit this. It's good practice and nicer for other devs to work with (and the sooner the module uses proper coding standards, the fewer patches will be affected by the change).
I can't set this RTBC as I've modified the patch myself, but I've certainly reviewed all the code changes from #1. Perhaps if Damien could review the new patch, then between us we could call this RTBC.
Comment #3
azinck commentedSorry to have fallen off the map here, fellas. Thanks for the patches here and elsewhere. I'll be getting them reviewed and committed shortly (and I'm making this comment here to hold myself accountable!).
Comment #4
azinck commentedMerged to dev (finally).
Comment #6
jweowu commentedCheers azinck. Nice to see all those patches committed :)