Closed (works as designed)
Project:
Views Load More
Version:
7.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Miscellaneous
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
5 Apr 2013 at 21:20 UTC
Updated:
22 May 2015 at 20:13 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
dwilkinson commentedI managed to figure this out - it turns out that there was an issue with the markup in the view. Infinite scroll over multiple views is working perfectly now.
Comment #2
vitkuz commentedWhat was the issue?
Comment #3
pribeh commentedYeah, what was the issue dwilkinson? I'm experiencing issues with multiple load more pagers.
Comment #4
dwilkinson commentedIn my case, the issue was that I had some specific template overrides set in Views, and the id that this module targets wasn't available. Once I had my views markup solved, everything worked.
Comment #5
funana commentedThank you very much for that hint @dwilkinson!
"views-row" class was missing in my view, using Semantic Views.
Added it there to the row class attribute field in display options, bingo!
Thx again man :)
Comment #6
nicholas.alipaz commentedNone of the aforementioned solutions worked for me. I found it was a bug in the js file. The issue was surrounding the variable
viewin the attach and detach behavior. What happened for me was that this variable was assigned the same data for each pager that was on the page. I had to change the code as in the attached patch to fix the issue.Comment #7
queenvictoria commentedNice work @nicholas.alipaz but this still didn't work for me. However $(this) is a reference to the pager link so I've updated your patch to use that instead.
Comment #8
queenvictoria commentedFixing my own patch. Use this one if you've NOT applied the remove patch from 1889300.
Comment #9
nicholas.alipaz commentedqueenvictoria, good catch on $(this), I suggest that rather than stacking your patch on mine, you make one that simply includes mine and your changes together, or was it that you didn't need my patch?
Comment #10
queenvictoria commented@nicholas.alipaz actually yes I didn't need anything except $(this) so the patch in #8 is complete. #7 accidentally stacked the patch from 1889300 (destroy).
Comment #11
m4oliveiI believe this was fixed differently in recent commits. If this is still an issue, please reopen and reroll against 7.x-1.x.
Thanks!