Is there a reason we don't?

Comments

anarcat’s picture

no

ergonlogic’s picture

Component: Code » Views integration
deciphered’s picture

I think the reason it wasn't implemented was that the bulk operations that have been implemented are somewhat simple and don't require any feedback from the user, whereas a backup requires the user to chose the name of the backup.

Not impossible, probably not even all that hard, just haven't got to it yet.

VBO is the major part that I didn't put an excessive amount of effort into so far, it still needs some superficial love.

anarcat’s picture

Couldn't we have a default name for backups?

deciphered’s picture

Actually, as it turns out, backups get automatically named if no custom name is provided, so this should be relatively simple. I'd still like to add the ability to provide a name on a site-by-site basis at some stage, but that can be a follow-up issue.

ergonlogic’s picture

Status: Needs review » Fixed

Fixed in 83e5d2b.

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

  • Commit 83e5d2b on 6.x-2.x, 7.x-3.x, dev-ssl-ip-allocation-refactor, dev-sni, dev-helmo-3.x by ergonlogic:
    Issue #2006074 by Deciphered: Enable backups via VBO.
    

  • Commit 83e5d2b on 6.x-2.x, 7.x-3.x, dev-ssl-ip-allocation-refactor, dev-sni, dev-helmo-3.x by ergonlogic:
    Issue #2006074 by Deciphered: Enable backups via VBO.