To ensure that formatters are outputting correct data, we should test the RDFa for all formatters.
#2034977: Create a base class for formatter RDFa tests
#2030929: Test text formatter RDFa output
#2139551: Support RDFa output in date formatter
#2149257: Support RDFa output in number field formatter
#2188895: Support RDFa output in entity reference field formatter
File: part of #1869600: Refactor RDF mappings to be inline with the new Entity Field API)
Image: part of #1869600: Refactor RDF mappings to be inline with the new Entity Field API)
#2188889: Support RDFa output in link field formatter
#2034975: Test RDFa output in email formatter
Options - N/A, options doesn't define new field types of its own.
#2034995: Test taxonomy term formatter RDFa output
#2188877: Support RDFa output in telephone field formatter
Comments
Comment #0.0
linclark CreditAttribution: linclark commentedAdded plaintext formatter module names.
Comment #0.1
linclark CreditAttribution: linclark commentedAdded email.
Comment #0.2
linclark CreditAttribution: linclark commentedAdded taxonomy.
Comment #1
scor CreditAttribution: scor commentedComment #2
scor CreditAttribution: scor commentedOnce these issues have been fixed, we should have a better idea on yched's suggestion from #1778122-53: Enable modules to inject attributes into field formatters, so that RDF attributes get output:
Wondering how much of this could / should be moved to a helper method in FormatterBase ? Probably no big deal, though.
Comment #2.0
scor CreditAttribution: scor commentedadd base class issue
Comment #3
scor CreditAttribution: scor commentedComment #4
scor CreditAttribution: scor commentedComment #5
scor CreditAttribution: scor as a volunteer commentedclosing the loop on this META. Those tests have all been added, see updated OP.