Closed (won't fix)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
11 Apr 2014 at 14:28 UTC
Updated:
30 Oct 2015 at 23:26 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
dagleesComment #2
phoang commentedFirst of all, you need to update your application page with more information as the application instruction, especially on step 5.
Second, please review and fix all errors was reported at http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxjdaglees1850482
After you resolve those errors, I will review your source code. Please let me know if you need any help to fix them.
Comment #3
heddnOnce you resolve the above coder standards, I think things are fairly ready to go. The module works as advertised. I use it on a few production sites. The long problem (not sure it is git vetted blocker, but is a release blocker) is https://drupal.org/node/2225525
Comment #4
dagleesAll fixed except:
as the names match the way Context implement their classes.
Comment #5
dagleesComment #6
heddnDaglees, there's still a lot of whitespace issues according to PAReview. And some low hanging fruit. Removing the low hanging fruit will avoid a lot of unecessary discussion here in the forum. So just do it.
If don't want to do that, at the very least these things must be address:
README.txt missing
Name the class context_cookie_condition
Master branch: http://drupal.org/node/1127732
Comment #7
dagleesI'll get back to this tonight.
Comment #8
dagleesMore fixes done. Still need to get the indentation right.
Comment #9
dagleesThe remaining issues are inherited from the Context module. Anyone has insight on this? I checked the latest release of Context and these methods are still called the same.
Comment #10
dagleesComment #11
heddnNon-blocking issues:
Miss spelled avialable.
The third line in the file doc comment must contain a description and must not be indented
Comment #12
dagleesFixed typo and added missing documentation.
Comment #13
dagleesIs there something we need to do or this just takes some time?
Comment #14
heddnThis has been RTBCed now for over week. I'll give it another week to see if any of the other git administrators have feedback, then I'll promote it to a full project.
One additional thing I noticed today (again, not a blocker) is
There is no need to pass by reference.
Comment #15
dagleesFixed the above and bumping issue.
Comment #16
pushpinderchauhan commented@Daglees, thankyou for your contribution.
Automated Review
Best practice issues identified by pareview.sh / drupalcs / coder. Yes http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxjdaglees1850482git reported some warnings, I know all warnings can't be fixed in your case but have a look again and do fix some new warnings.
Manual Review
admin/structure/context/settings/cookiepage. It produces following warnings when I submitted this form.And I checked another pages and found given warning is coming on every page:

It seems blocker from my side, need to fix it.
configure = admin/structure/context/settings/cookiein .info file, to enable it directly access from module page.$keysis doing here, please add your comment on this.administer site configuration.$namehold here?The starred items (*) are fairly big issues and warrant going back to Needs Work. Items marked with a plus sign (+) are important and should be addressed before a stable project release. The rest of the comments in the code walkthrough are recommendations.
As I am not a git administrator, so I would recommend you, please help to review other project applications to get a review bonus. This will put you on the high priority list, then git administrators will take a look at your project right away :-)
Thanks Again!
Comment #17
dagleesThank you for these points Pushpinder. I'll work on the module and update this.
Comment #18
PA robot commentedClosing due to lack of activity. If you are still working on this application, you should fix all known problems and then set the status to "Needs review". (See also the project application workflow).
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #19
mtiminer commentedI really really need the functionality it provides. I tried using the experiment and indeed i get the same errors shown in the pictures on comment 16. Any updates would be greatly appreciated. Is this project abandoned?