Closed (fixed)
Project:
Rules
Version:
8.x-3.x-dev
Component:
Rules Core
Priority:
Major
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
17 May 2014 at 13:15 UTC
Updated:
22 Mar 2020 at 06:44 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
omissis commentedComment #2
omissis commentedComment #3
paranojik commentedComment #4
fagoComment #5
bircherComment #6
jzavrl commentedComment #7
nebel54Comment #8
bircherComment #9
fagoComment #10
dasjoComment #11
dasjoComment #12
dasjoComment #13
dasjohere's a list of current d7 rules conditions
Data
Data comparison (data_is)
Data value is empty (data_is_empty)
List contains item (list_contains)
List count comparison (list_count_is)
Text comparison (text_matches)
Entities
Entity is new (entity_is_new)
Entity has field (entity_has_field)
Entity is of type (entity_is_of_type)
Entity is of bundle (entity_is_of_bundle)
User has field access (entity_field_access)
Node
Content is of type (node_is_of_type)
Content is promoted to frontpage (node_is_promoted)
Content is published (node_is_published)
Content is sticky (node_is_sticky)
Path
Path has URL alias (path_has_alias)
URL alias exists (path_alias_exists)
User
User has role(s) (user_has_role)
User is blocked (user_is_blocked)
PHP (evil)
Execute custom PHP code (php_eval)
Comment #14
dasjoupdated to add a complete conditions overview
Comment #15
dasjoComment #16
fagoComment #17
diarmy commentedComment #18
Torenware commentedI made sure that ibonelli is marked as working on #2281089.
Comment #19
dasjoComment #20
dasjoComment #21
dasjoas its a meta issue without a patch, setting to active instead of needs work
Comment #22
fagoI re-opened a few issues where there is some follow-up work todo.
Comment #23
simeI'm noticing that in d8 all the rules conditions appear to be broken in the block configuration - was this due to a change in core since they were done? or was the block configuration integration a pending task?
Comment #24
fagoad sime: thx, I've opened for #2675698: Ensure compatibility with core block UI (part of #2675682: [META] Condition compatibility with Core/CTools conditions) for handling this!
Comment #25
tr commentedBump. Looking for people to address the few remaining issues here.
Comment #26
tr commentedAll conditions have now been ported to D8, so this meta has been completed. Problems with and/or enhancements of these conditions should be handled in follow-up issues.