The output of XBBCodeFilter needs to be tested - especially with some very quirky / invalid markup, and insane escape sequences in the tag element itself.
Eg.
[foobar foo=bar\ bar bar=foo\\\ f"oo foobar="foo'\ \\\"" barfoo='foobar\ \'\\\\\"']
Should (if I didn't miscount the backslashes) yield attributes represented by the following PHP literal:
[
'foo' => "bar bar",
'bar' => 'foo\\\\ f"oo',
'foobar' => "foo'\\ \\\"",
'barfoo' => 'foobar\\ \'\\\\\\"',
]
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #11 | 2630676-10-Test-template-tags.patch | 5.56 KB | cburschka |
| #8 | 2630676-Test-basic-filter-operation.patch | 1.75 KB | cburschka |
| #2 | 0001-Issue-2630676-Test-attribute-parsing.patch | 3.49 KB | cburschka |
Comments
Comment #2
cburschkaTest for the attribute values.
This should fail, because the attribute value parsing has a bug whose patch hasn't yet been published.
Comment #3
cburschkaThe one time I want a test to fail... :-/
Hm.
It's not actually running the new test case. This seems weird.
Comment #4
cburschkaOh well. I guess that means we need to push it to run the test - after first pushing the fix.
Comment #6
cburschkaComment #7
cburschka...oh wait, that's just one of the tests.
Comment #8
cburschkaThis should definitely fail, because the test hits two known bugs (the one in #263422: Add a "Continue Shopping" button to my cart? and a regex-regression).
Comment #9
cburschkaI guess the testbot is unable to see tests added by a patch or something.
Comment #11
cburschkaMore testing.
Comment #13
cburschkaThere's probably quite a bit more.
Comment #15
cburschka