Needs work
Project:
Localization server
Version:
6.x-2.x-dev
Component:
User interface
Priority:
Major
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
12 Jun 2010 at 09:06 UTC
Updated:
24 Jun 2013 at 17:03 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
gábor hojtsyComment #2
magnus commentedThis would be a nice feature. I applied the patch and it works great!
Comment #3
zirvap commentedI've marked #1450718: Add one more statistic to the l.d.o contribution section as a duplicate of this.
Comment #4
skyredwangHow can I review this patch? please advice.
Comment #5
zirvap commentedHere's information on reviewing patches: http://drupal.org/patch/review
Comment #6
skyredwangSorry, what I meant was that where was the code base/sandbox for the Localization server? So, I can test out the patch.
Comment #7
zirvap commentedAha, I see. I suppose here: http://drupal.org/project/l10n_server , or follow the link to "Repository viewer" in the sidebar.
Comment #8
Anthony Fok commentedHello there!
Any more progress on this? Could this patch be applied to http://localize.drupal.org/ ?
I think this would be a marvelous addition! :-)
Cheers,
Anthony
Comment #9
Anthony Fok commentedI am re-uploading the patch listed in the Issue Summary in hope of getting it re-tested and re-accepted, as this feature is highly desired and would help solve a big problem we are dealing with in the zh-hans translation group.
Credits go to the original patch author, of course. Not to me. :-)
Comment #10
skyredwangYou don't need to duplicate the patch here. If you want to help, then please review the patch.
What's the "big problem" you are referring to? Feel free to open a localize.drupal.org webmaster issue if necessary.
Comment #11
droplet commentedIt may need a reroll against D7 or 6.3-dev.
I will do it if no takers but before any actions, I'd like to hear committers feedback.
Comment #12
skyredwangThe patch needs to roll against D7 head, then backport to 6.3-dev, since it's still supported.
Comment #13
Anthony Fok commented@skyredwang: I was trying to force a "re-test" of the patch against the current branch, since @droplet's original submission remained at the "Test request sent" stage. However, it did not work, and then it was only then that I realized l10n_server is already at 6.x-3.x branch... Oh well... :-)