Have your group get a lazy administrator ? LOL.

added administer reviewed & approved strings stat.

Support from Acquia helps fund testing for Drupal Acquia logo

Comments

Gábor Hojtsy’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review
Magnus’s picture

Title: administrator stats » Administrator statistics
Priority: Minor » Normal
Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community

This would be a nice feature. I applied the patch and it works great!

zirvap’s picture

skyredwang’s picture

How can I review this patch? please advice.

zirvap’s picture

Here's information on reviewing patches: http://drupal.org/patch/review

skyredwang’s picture

Sorry, what I meant was that where was the code base/sandbox for the Localization server? So, I can test out the patch.

zirvap’s picture

Aha, I see. I suppose here: http://drupal.org/project/l10n_server , or follow the link to "Repository viewer" in the sidebar.

Anthony Fok’s picture

Hello there!

Any more progress on this? Could this patch be applied to http://localize.drupal.org/ ?
I think this would be a marvelous addition! :-)

Cheers,
Anthony

Anthony Fok’s picture

I am re-uploading the patch listed in the Issue Summary in hope of getting it re-tested and re-accepted, as this feature is highly desired and would help solve a big problem we are dealing with in the zh-hans translation group.

Credits go to the original patch author, of course. Not to me. :-)

skyredwang’s picture

You don't need to duplicate the patch here. If you want to help, then please review the patch.

What's the "big problem" you are referring to? Feel free to open a localize.drupal.org webmaster issue if necessary.

droplet’s picture

Priority: Normal » Major

It may need a reroll against D7 or 6.3-dev.

I will do it if no takers but before any actions, I'd like to hear committers feedback.

skyredwang’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Needs work

The patch needs to roll against D7 head, then backport to 6.3-dev, since it's still supported.

Anthony Fok’s picture

@skyredwang: I was trying to force a "re-test" of the patch against the current branch, since @droplet's original submission remained at the "Test request sent" stage. However, it did not work, and then it was only then that I realized l10n_server is already at 6.x-3.x branch... Oh well... :-)