I think we should avoid confusion by still having a maintainer for Garland, its pretty clear that the current state of Garland is unmaintained and has no leading person. Since Steef hasn't been active for a long time, I find it rather silly to keep him up there - especially if we want MAINTAINERS.TXT to hold any value.

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#5 maintainer.steef_.patch529 bytesBojhan
#4 maintainer.steef_.patch529 bytesBojhan
#2 remove.steef_.maintainerstxt.patch540 bytesBojhan
remove.steef_.maintainer.patch536 bytesBojhan

Comments

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, remove.steef_.maintainer.patch, failed testing.

Bojhan’s picture

Bojhan commented
Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new remove.steef_.maintainerstxt.patch540 bytes

meh

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, remove.steef_.maintainerstxt.patch, failed testing.

Bojhan’s picture

Bojhan commented
Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new maintainer.steef_.patch529 bytes
Bojhan’s picture

Bojhan commented
StatusFileSize
new maintainer.steef_.patch529 bytes
Bojhan’s picture

Bojhan commented

I give up, I tried another 5 editors.

dries’s picture

dries commented
Status: Needs review » Fixed

Committed to CVS HEAD.

Bojhan’s picture

Bojhan commented

@Dries you saw it had invalid format?

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.