Comments

juliangb’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new2.26 KB

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--918750-1.patch, failed testing.

juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new7.19 KB

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--918750-3.patch, failed testing.

juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new11.05 KB
juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community

I will commit this in a few days unless anyone comments with a reason not to.

juliangb’s picture

tchurch, would you mind committing this one please?

juliangb’s picture

#5: storm--918750-5.patch queued for re-testing.

Just noticed that the test results for the latest patch only showed one assertion for the new test.

juliangb’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Needs review

Not sure whether this is OK or not.

On the one hand, there are no exceptions or test failures, but on the other hand, there should be a number more test passes.

juliangb’s picture

#5: storm--918750-5.patch queued for re-testing.

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--918750-5.patch, failed testing.

juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review

#5: storm--918750-5.patch queued for re-testing.

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--918750-5.patch, failed testing.

juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new11.03 KB

Patch for testbot.

Not complete - checking where the test aborts.

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--918750-14.patch, failed testing.

juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new11.06 KB

Again, trying to find where the test aborts.

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--918750-16.patch, failed testing.

juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new11.06 KB

Entire test commented out.

juliangb’s picture

StatusFileSize
new11.09 KB

Corrected comment brackets.

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--918750-19.patch, failed testing.

rjgoldsborough’s picture

I am working on this test, and had a question. I didn't notice it before but when creating a project, you do not have to specify an organization. But when creating a task you do. It doesn't make sense as you could create a project without an organization, but then you would not be able to create a task for that project without first creating an organization. Then in the timetrack code, where the project list is generated, there is an sql query involving an organization id. This is bad because you would only get projects that have an organization, which isn't required. So this seems to limit the timetrack node quite a bit.

Also a little off topic, but I want to bring it up as I just saw it.
So it seems like the requirements on some of these are a bit off.
It looks as if you could create a project with no organization, and then try to create a ticket for that project without success as it requires an organization that the project may or not be a part of. (seems similar to the task situation above)

Ok, that's all for now. (I could just be overthinking this, but it seems to make sense to me heh)

juliangb’s picture

It is definitely a bug if any module does not perform totally with only the minimum required modules enabled.

juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review

Reroll. Also needs review as its been a while since I've looked at this.

juliangb’s picture

StatusFileSize
new10.84 KB

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--918750-23.patch, failed testing.

juliangb’s picture

Version: 6.x-1.x-dev » 6.x-2.x-dev
juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review

#24: storm--918750-23.patch queued for re-testing.

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--918750-23.patch, failed testing.

juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review

#24: storm--918750-23.patch queued for re-testing.

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--918750-23.patch, failed testing.

juliangb’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » juliangb
Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new2.12 KB

Just a patch with the tests.

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--tt-tests.patch, failed testing.

juliangb’s picture

Category: feature » task
Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new5.89 KB

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch, storm--tt-tests2.patch, failed testing.

juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new9.6 KB
juliangb’s picture

Committed to 2.x.

Retest on 1.x.

juliangb’s picture

#35: storm--tt-test3.patch queued for re-testing.

juliangb’s picture

Version: 6.x-2.x-dev » 6.x-1.x-dev
juliangb’s picture

StatusFileSize
new9.6 KB
juliangb’s picture

StatusFileSize
new9.86 KB
juliangb’s picture

Status: Needs review » Fixed

Committed to 1.x.

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.