Closed (duplicate)
Project:
Drupal.org Redesign
Component:
Everything Else
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
21 Oct 2010 at 02:10 UTC
Updated:
5 Jul 2013 at 04:28 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
I've noticed that a few accessibility issues have been discovered during QA of the redesign, and I've noticed a few issues myself. We need to systematically conduct an accessibility evaluation of the redesign against WCAG 2.0. My recommendation is that we evaluate against level AA, as this will ensure that the site is very accessible, and is what we aim for with Drupal 7 Core themes.
this is understandably a great deal of work, and I am not quite sure of the best method of dividing the labor. I am personally not available at present to volunteer to perform the evaluation, but will happily provide feedback on any bugs generated from the evaluation if they are tagged with 'accessibility'.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #5 | Accessibility QA for Drupal.org-V1.xls | 10.5 KB | shyamala |
Comments
Comment #1
bowersox commented+1 Yes, we should certainly review the new site for WCAG 2.0. In the future we should include WCAG compliance in the specifications when we contract out any work.
Congratulations on getting this launched. It represents a lot of hard work. If there's any time or budget left for revisions and follow-up, meeting WCAG 2.0 should be high on the list.
Comment #2
Amazon commentedHi Everett, thanks for posting this. We are committed to making the Drupal.org site accessible. We're filing issues in the redesign queue for now. I recommend adding a specific tag like 'drupal.org redesign accessibility' so there a queue we can work on.
Kieran
Comment #3
Everett Zufelt commentedTagging. We still need a systematic method of evaluating the redesign against WCAG 2.0. Did the originally design spec require accessibility?
Comment #4
mgifford1st, the design looks so much better visually. Other than the having major headings like Download & Extend where I would expect to find the project heading (I already know I I'm in the project section), I've been very happy with how it looks, works & indeed how the migration happened. But that's only in my experience looking at and using the code.
We do need to look at a better system for evaluating core (at this point for D8), as well as Drupal association websites to ensure that we can have the widest participation possible in this great community. I would like to see RFP's for design include an accessibility element to them. I've got no idea how the design/theming was done, but it's a good practice and it should be addressed like we want usability testing to be done.
There's a wiki we're working on here to look at defining what the best practices are:
http://groups.drupal.org/node/94484
At some point we'll have to do the jump to D7 which will help considerably. However, there's lots we can do with D6.
Comment #5
shyamala commentedPreliminary QA results for Accessibility using Wave:
1) Sitewide: Drupal Logo to Have Alt text
2) Getstarted: Alt tag not provided for the Books image. The Books image is the only content with the hyperlink.
3) Member Directory, Drupal Core, Individual Module Page, Dashboard Page, Search Result Page, Security Overview Page: Form Label Missing: Search Box
4) Logged in User Node Page:
5) Member Directory Page: Orphaned Form Label: Mailing List, not associated with any form type for the Username Label above the search box on the right side bar
6) Mail lists: Orphaned Form Label: Mailing List, not associated with any form type for Mail lists select Label
Comment #6
Everett Zufelt commentedThanks for the effort. I really don't understand all of your post, and I don't understand why you didn't file separate issues. I only have time to review properly filed and documented bugs. Thanks again.
Comment #7
drummAll accessibility issues should be tagged 'drupal.org redesign' and 'accessibility,' putting them in this listing, http://drupal.org/project/issues/search?text=&projects=&assigned=&submitted=&participant=&status[]=Open&issue_tags_op=and&issue_tags=drupal.org+redesign,+accessibility.
For the specific points from #5:
1) The Drupal logo is regular text, using CSS to replace with a background image,
<div id="site-name"><a href="http://drupal.org" title="Drupal">Drupal</a></div>. As far as I know, this is fully accessible.2) Confirmed the image under Books at http://drupal.org/start is missing an alt attribute. Needs an issue filed.
3, 5 & 6) Can probably start each as one issue, everything needs URLs and specific details.
4) Probably not a whole lot to do here. The comment link text and form are direct from Drupal core. Knowing specifics would help.
Comment #8
shyamala commentedSpecific Accessibility issues filed.
With reference to #5:
2) Get started Issue filed at http://drupal.org/node/958692
6) Mailing Lists Issue filed at http://drupal.org/node/958694
5) Member Directory Issue filed at http://drupal.org/node/958696
3) Form label for Search Box on Module Issue block at http://drupal.org/node/958700 and
Member directory: User search Form Label missing at: http://drupal.org/node/958696#comment-3650220
Search Page Form Label missing at: http://drupal.org/node/958704
Will detail 4) further.
Comment #9
mgiffordThanks! Glad to see these issues being identified & hopefully soon fixed.
Comment #10
shyamala commentedThe Main Colours that fail while using the Juicy Studio toolbar's Colour Contrast Analyser on Drupal.org HOME PAGE are at: http://drupal.org/node/946344#comment-3654420
Comment #11
lisarex commentedClosing this issue down, as part of closing down the Redesign project, and looks like there's already duplicate issues.
Comment #12
mgiffordJust renaming to avoid confusion.