BPO Canada Global Services Corporation ( Canada, India )

BPO Canada Global Services Corporation currently services Drupal Clients across US, Canada and UK.

BPO Canada specializes in Drupal Development. We offer end-to-end Drupal Services.

·

Installation

·

Configuration

·

Customization,

·

Upgrades/Porting Sites or modules

·

Creating Multi Site Environment

·

Building Installer Profiles

·

Site Maintenance

·

Performance Tuning

·

Hosting

·

Training

·

SEO/SEM

·

Advisory Services

·

On Demand Support.

Between India and Canada, we have one of the world’s largest Drupal development team. Our Drupal Clients range from startup companies to Fortune 1000 corporations.

We also act as the sole Drupal Development partner for many US/Canada based Web Development firms.

Drupal Services

We have unparalleled expertise in building highly scalable sites. We have very good client retention ratio and our pricing is very competitive and our turnaround and delivery times are very quick.

We love to work in different areas of Drupal. Our recent participation has been in projects like:

http://www.la2day.com

http://www.openarchitecturenetwork.org

http://www.youngbodymind.com ( Digg.com type site )

http://www.gujjuweb.com

http://www.3localbids.com

http://www.artisticpursuit.com

We have focused teams for Theme Development, Module Development, Server and Site Administrations. Our On Demand Support team which offers 24x7 Support is picked from the best developers to provide very quick turnaround to your issues in a live production environment.

Pricing

Our pricing is very competitive. If you are a registered non-profit, you will immensely benefit with our special pricing options for non-profits.

If you want to find more about us, please visit our website http://www.bpocanada.com

Comments

webchick’s picture

webchick
she/they
Primary language English
Location Vancouver 🇨🇦
commented

Hi there, in order to be listed in the Services directory, we need information on what your company has been contributing back to the project. You mention training, theme, and module development. Are there modules, themes and/or documentation you could cite that your company has sponsored and put back out into drupal.org?

Please see http://drupal.org/drupal-services for more info on this requirement.

Zen’s picture

Zen commented

Please make up your mind - are you guys BPO Canada or Gloscon?

bpocanada’s picture

bpocanada commented

1) Our Gloscon - rebranding is delayed for now. We switched our CVS account from bpocanada to gloscon early on since we had issues on submiting modules from bpocanada CVS account.
2) We are maintaining ePublish
3) We have contributed subdomain_manager module
4) We will be contributing Creative Commons Lite and node_blaster module this week.

We are also promoting Drupal CMS and at the same time helping more developers get trained in Drupal. http://groups.drupal.org/ahmedabad We'll certainly review other companies in the list and do our best to bridge the gaps.

bpocanada’s picture

bpocanada commented

What would be the next step to get listed?

greggles’s picture

greggles
he/him
Primary language English
Location Denver, Colorado, USA
commented

I see that you have made several commits keeping epublish up to date. http://drupal.org/project/cvs/31019 However, please note the proper format for cvs commit messages.

For the http://drupal.org/project/node_blaster project a better description would be helpful (I have no idea what it does) and you should create a release of the module.

In http://cvs.drupal.org/viewcvs/drupal/contributions/modules/creativecommo... the LICENSE.txt should be removed. That instruction is described in the CVS FAQ http://cvs.drupal.org/viewcvs/drupal/contributions/FAQ.txt?rev=1.7&view=...

It's quite disappointing to me to see http://drupal.org/project/creativecommons_lite where you have "simplified" the module, only have a 4.7 release, don't clarify what was simplified, and from my review of http://drupal.org/project/issues/creativecommons you didn't submit issues to cooperatively help reduce the complexity the original project. Instead you just forked without an attempt at collaboration.

Among the new modules that you created it looks like they are all contributed well after the release of 5.x but only have 4.7 versions and have only had a 1.1 revision - i.e. they don't seem to be maintained.

There isn't really a set documented level of contribution effort that you have to make to get listed on the services directory. Lots of site maintainers can make this change, so it's up to one of them to want to do it.

However, you haven't really demonstrated a good working interaction with the Drupal project. I imagine that this lack of a good interaction has resulted in a lukewarm response to your request to be added which means that so far nobody has been willing to add your company. Luckily it's relatively easy to fix the things I pointed out above at which point I imagine someone will want to add you. Perhaps it could happen sooner. But I won't do it personally without seeing a more clear indication that you contribute to the community (based on things like code, help in the forums/mailing lists, or contributed handbook pages).

One last note - your profile page looks like an seo experiment gone bad - http://drupal.org/user/75934 You're interested in "Joint Ventures", "Acting as Advisor" and your own phone numbers?

bpocanada’s picture

bpocanada commented

Thanks for the inputs Greg Will upgrade all modules to 5.1 in 1 week and also update the project text.

dww’s picture

dww
we/he/they
commented

as i mentioned at http://drupal.org/node/143916 -- i, too, am concerned about the "creativecommons_lite" project. this seems like a needless fork. my inclination would be to unpublish this project entirely, but maybe i'm being too harsh.

furthermore, we frown upon the practice of sharing a single d.o and/or CVS account among many users. this causes all sorts of problems. each of you (i have no idea how many people "we" refers to) should make your own accounts and use those, instead of sharing an account, since it makes it impossible to hold people accountable for their actions, etc.

Gurpartap Singh’s picture

Gurpartap Singh commented

It's not an examination to mark the answers and pass out. The selection is based on popularity, a other factors which marks the "nobels". And you could get rid of "We"? ^_^

bpocanada’s picture

bpocanada commented

http://drupal.org/node/35528 - also contributed CC 4.7 upgrade patch but our client wanted a simplified version. I had contacted Peter and left few messages but never got a call back. We ended up building this from scratch. This is a very light simlified version and can be very useful.

I'm sure that I can have someone from my team work with Peter and see how we can rationalize rather than have 2 versions.

I'm fine if at all, this needs to be unpublished. I just thought it would help others who want a simpler module and hence contributed. Before writing this 'Lite' version, I had tried all options.

heine’s picture

heine commented
Status: Active » Closed (won't fix)

Adding a de facto "won't fix".

gloscon’s picture

gloscon commented
Status: Closed (won't fix) » Active

Reopening it and requesting reconsideration.

http://drupal.org/node/283273

Gurpartap Singh’s picture

Gurpartap Singh commented
Status: Active » Closed (duplicate)

Please maintain only 1 ticket for the same issue.

gloscon’s picture

gloscon commented
Status: Closed (duplicate) » Closed (fixed)

Sure...

http://drupal.org/node/283273 - Please use this ticket as our name have changed to Gloscon. Closing the current ticket as its duplicate.