Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
16 Mar 2012 at 10:59 UTC
Updated:
25 Jan 2013 at 19:31 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
patrickd commentedwelcome,
Please read about the project application workflow.
while waiting for an in-depht review of your module you can start out fixing some coding style issues detected by automated tools:
http://ventral.org/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxtorotil1485064git
You can also get a review bonus and we will come back to your application sooner.
regards
Comment #2
torotil commentedThe automatically detected issues are fixed as far as it goes:
Comment #3
alesr commentedThere are some unknown characters in README.txt file:
Still issues from PAReview to solve. Check appended file.
You are missing "." (dot) at the end of Implements
should be
Also add dots to other comment ending lines.
Comment #4
torotil commentedThanks for pointing me at the dots in the Implements comments. I've fixed them now and also the @file comments.
The invalid character that you've mentioned is simply "…" which is a valid utf-8 character. I've replaced it with "..." which should work around your problems.
When will we finally overcome ASCII?!
This leaves only:
Comment #5
torotil commentedComment #6
ClaudeSchlesser commentedHello,
phpcs found a few errors (please have a look at the attached file).
After having installed the module I saw "Requires: Context (missing)"
You should include a link to this module in your README.TXT
This simplifies the setup for user (like me) that don't have the context module yet.
Regards,
Comment #7
ClaudeSchlesser commentedComment #8
patrickd commentedDon't set needs work on minor issues
// never mind :)
Comment #9
ClaudeSchlesser commentedSorry, this is was my first review ;)
Comment #11
torotil commentedsetting to major according to the review process timeline.
Comment #12
torotil commentedhas been "needs review" for 4 weeks -> critical
Comment #13
klausiSorry for the delay, but you have not listed any reviews of other project applications in your issue summary as strongly recommended in the application documentation.
manual review:
But that are just minor issues, otherwise I think this is RTBC.
Comment #14
torotil commentedThanks for your review.
As a full-time drupal-dev I simply haven't had the time to make reviews during the last few months - sorry for that.
ad 1. I've already added a link to the context module in the online project description and will take look at the linked article before I make this a full drupal project.
ad 2. I'll look into that.
ad 3. they aren't the number of referers usually is rather low during the lifetime of a drupal-session.
Comment #15
patrickd commentedPlease really add some more information like installation and usage instructions to your project page, nobody (I know) would ever read a readme for usage instructions.
Thanks for your contribution and welcome to the community of project contributors on drupal.org!! :)
I've granted you the git vetted user role which will let you promote this to a full project and also create new projects as either sandbox or "full" projects depending on which you feel is best.
Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.
As you continue to work on your module, keep in mind: Commit messages - providing history and credit and Release naming conventions.
Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.
Comment #18
nally commentedCongrats torotil !
Did this ever get moved over to a bona fide project? It seems like a pretty interesting "missing link" to me.
Comment #18.0
nally commentedadded a comment about other modules implementing this functionality