It would be useful on sites where multiple people contribute weblinks if the module would check for duplicate URLs within the existing weblinks.

Thanks for the cool module.
Steve

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#4 weblinks7.patch962 bytesnancydru

Comments

summit’s picture

Subscribing.
I use links_weblink, but would very much like this feature working!
Thanks for replying!
greetings,
Martijn

nancydru’s picture

Marked http://drupal.org/node/261218 as duplicate.

rmiddle’s picture

Adding to the very long todo list.

Thanks
Robert

nancydru’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » nancydru
Status: Active » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new962 bytes

This is for alpha5. It also makes sure the URL is valid.

rmiddle’s picture

Thanks again NancyDru,

I am doing a little CVS works getting ready for pretty major cleanup. Will get this committed soon.

Thanks
Robert

rmiddle’s picture

Version: 5.x-1.7 » 5.x-1.10
Status: Needs review » Fixed

Committed to CVS for both 5.x and 6.x. Will be included in 5.x-1.11 and 6.x-1.0-alpha6.

Thanks
Robert

nancydru’s picture

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

didn't close automatically

summit’s picture

Hi,

May be stupid question, sorry for that than, but will this module be integrated with links_package anywhere down the road?
This thing of duplicate url checking would be nice to have in links_weblink.module also, thats why I ask.

Greetings,
Martijn

rmiddle’s picture

Martjin,

I have never looked at the links module I have no idea how close the two are. I am not against a merge of the two but as of now have no plans for a merge.

Thanks
Robert.

nancydru’s picture

See #285699: Comparison to Links Package Your help in writing a comparison would go a long way to getting this started.

summit’s picture

It would be already great if the input from both modules would be possible to output also by both.
Now when I make link through weblink nodetype (links_weblink.module) it is differently understand than the weblinks nodetype.

Why not integrate weblinks as using the same database tables as links_weblink. Or the other way around?

Greetings,
Martijn

rmiddle’s picture

Changes are the databases have diff names. There is zero coordination between these two modules I only found out that links_weblink even exists in the last few weeks. At some point I might download and look though there code but from there page it looks like they took a fork on weblinks during the dead times and created a fork.

Thanks
Robert

summit’s picture

Hi Robert,

Thanks for your reply again. I am using links_weblink and like the functionality. Thanks for looking through the code some point, maybe, will look at web links 5 also. May be possible some point in time otherwise script to make links_weblink content into weblinks content. But for now thanks for your answer.

greetings,
Martijn