[D7] Apollo XIII

Add the git clone link to your summary. You should set a default branch http://drupal.org/node/1659588
Also, you have errors in your code, http://ventral.org/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxmenthol1944148git

Hi, i reviewed your module, all is ok for me!

Only one about current issue, your link to git repo wrong, please use:

git clone http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/menthol/1944148.git apollo_xiii

We are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)

Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.

Add git clone.

Review of the 7.x-1.x branch:

• Coder Sniffer has found some issues with your code (please check the Drupal coding standards).
  

  FILE: /home/klausi/pareview_temp/includes/views/apollo_xiii.views_default.inc
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  FOUND 2 ERROR(S) AFFECTING 2 LINE(S)
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   4 | ERROR | The second line in the file doc comment must be " * @file"
   5 | ERROR | The third line in the file doc comment must contain a description
     |       | and must not be indented
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  

This automated report was generated with PAReview.sh, your friendly project application review script. You can also use the online version to check your project. You have to get a review bonus to get a review from me.

manual review:

1. What are the differences to the existing sandboxes? Please add that to the project page, so that users can make an educated decision which one to use.
2. apollo_xiii_query_plugin.inc: so there is no caching here, the query always executes the HTTP request. Maybe you should add to the documentation that users need to heavily cache their views?

But otherwise looks RTBC to me. Removing review bonus tag, you can add it again if you have done another 3 reviews of other projects.

Assigning to jthorson as he might have time to take a final look at this.

Trying to remove tag again.

no objections for more than a week, so ...

Thanks for your contribution, bennetteson!

I updated your account to let you promote this to a full project and also create new projects as either a sandbox or a "full" project.

Here are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:

• Dries' post on Responsible maintainers
• Best practices for creating and maintaining projects
• Maintaining a drupal.org project with Git
• Commit messages - providing history and credit
• Release naming conventions.
• Helping maintainers in the issue queues

You can find lots more contributors chatting on IRC in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and get involved!

Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.

Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.