Drupal Services and Solutions Company - drupalpoint.com

While it is not necessarily the most authoritative source, Wikipedia spells it out in plain English:

The law considers a trademark to be a form of property. Proprietary rights in relation to a trademark may be established through actual use in the marketplace, or through registration of the mark with the trademarks office (or "trademarks registry") of a particular jurisdiction, e.g., the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. In many jurisdictions, trademark rights can be established through either or both means. Certain jurisdictions generally do not recognize trademarks rights arising through use (e.g. China or European Union). If trademark owners do not hold registrations for their marks in such jurisdictions, the extent to which they will be able to enforce their rights through trademark infringement proceedings will therefore be limited. In cases of dispute, this disparity of rights is often referred to as "first to file" as opposed to "first to use". Other countries such as Germany offer a limited amount of common law rights for unregistered marks where to gain protection, the goods or services must occupy a highly significant position in the marketplace - where this could be 40% or more market share for sales in the particular class of goods or services.

A registered trademark confers a bundle of exclusive rights upon the registered owner, including the right to exclusive use of the mark in relation to the products or services for which it is registered. The law in most jurisdictions also allows the owner of a registered trademark to prevent unauthorized use of the mark in relation to products or services which are identical or "colourfully" similar to the "registered" products or services, and in certain cases, prevent use in relation to entirely dissimilar products or services. The test is always whether a consumer of the goods or services will be confused as to the identity of the source or origin. An example maybe a very large multinational brand such as "Sony" where a non-electronic product such as a pair of sunglasses might be assumed to have come from Sony Corporation of Japan despite not being a class of goods that Sony has rights in.

Once trademark rights are established in a particular jurisdiction, these rights are generally only enforceable in that jurisdiction, a quality which is sometimes known as territoriality. However, there is a range of international trademark laws and systems which facilitate the protection of trademarks in more than one jurisdiction (see International trademark laws below).

The most important phrase is this: "The test is always whether a consumer of the goods or services will be confused as to the identity of the source or origin." This is not helped much by the fact that you have Dries's trademark message on your site too. Since you do not own the trademark you do not own the right to display it. A trademark is reserved for use by the trademark owner, since it is their property. A trademark can be bought and sold but at present as far as I know Dries is the current owner of the Drupal trademark.

Basically it wouldn't take much to determine that Drupalpoint, operating as a brand of software developers is in breach of trademark, within the jurisdiction of this site at least, if not most of the internet, and is riding off the name and reputation of someone else's work. But it is really up to the Drupal community to enforce it. So far obviously they haven't, but legally they can. Out of respect for the community and copyright law, by saying what I did I was suggesting that you change your brand and save Drupal.org some legal fees. Take it or leave it.