Run at least three sessions to test the usability of installing drupal.
To do this you will need 3 or more volunteers who will evaluate drupal's installation pages. It is important that everyone understands that drupal is being tested, not the evaluator (your volunteers). The evaluator can not pass or fail.
Ask each of the volunteers to install a drupal 6 site. Provide them with a scenario that will inspire them to do it realistically. e.g. "You have been asked to create a website for your soccer club".
You might like to provide a more detailed scenario and more detailed tasks for them to complete. See the UMN formal usability testing plan for ideas on how to do this. Your scenario and tasks should give the evaluator a clear goal and help inspire creativity when it's required, like for creating the site name and slogan (which incidentally is not being tested but is required to complete the evaluator's tasks).
To familiarize yourself with the tasks and usability tests, it is useful to do you're own test and report before running the tests with evaluators. This will help you gain confidence with finding issues and taking notes on them. It's also important that you test that the tasks can actually be completed without your interference during the test.
While observing new users, take note of:
- what the evaluator wants to do first
- where the evaluator gets lost or confused
- what the user expected
- where the evaluator spends their time in the first 30 minutes of the session
- where the evaluator spends their time in the first few seconds of each new UI / page
- when and where they search for help
- where they search for help
Perhaps the most valuable information from a usability test is knowing what the user expected. This makes it easier to discover usability bugs and suggest solutions. You should spend some time immediately after each test (while it's still fresh in the evaluator's mind) debriefing the evaluator to find out their answers to the above questions. You might find that you misinterpreted their behavior. Some evaluators find this difficult and begin to feel like they are being tested. If this is the case, don't pressure them to give you better feedback but help them to relax, remind them no answer is right or wrong and ask simpler questions about how they felt emotionally about the tasks they found difficult. If the evaluator can't give you good feedback then don't persist. You still have notes from watching their behavior, right?
Write a report that summarizes your findings. We're looking for a level of
detail and format similar to Factory Joe's Usability report on drupal 6 beta 1. See also the reports from GHOP tasks #8 and #7.
There are two completed GHOP tasks that are usability tests like this one; #7 (d.o), and #8 (d.o). The installation screens have had a number of improvements since those tests were done.
Before planning your usability tests read about how to do usability testing:
- http://www.uxmatters.com/MT/archives/000183.php
- http://openusability.org/
- http://keycontent.org/tiki-index.php?page=Usability+Tools
- http://factoryjoe.pbwiki.com/FeedbackForDrupal6
Deliverables: This task is complete when the report has been submitted to by the student, and reviewed and approved by the mentor or other appropriate drupal community member. The report should be made available in a widely available format like plain text, html or PDF.
You may include screenshots for bonus points. These could be annotated using flickr's annotate tool. (Tag them with drupalui if using flickr.)
Bevan is the owner / mentor of this task.
Comments
Comment #1
Bevan commentedWoops. I forgot to tag this GHOP in 'categories'.
This is the last in a series of four usability-testing tasks.
http://drupal.org/node/211341 needs review
http://drupal.org/node/211110 #158 needs a student
http://drupal.org/node/209372 #153 is claimed
Comment #2
aclight commentedOk, go ahead and taskify this.
BTW, we are only marking issues on d.o that are the issues used to track the student's progress with the GHOP taxonomy term. Task ideas don't get that term. I realize this is probably not stated anywhere. Sorry about that.
Comment #3
Bevan commentedGoogle code: http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-drupal/issues/...
Work location: http://drupal.org/node/211815
Comment #4
aclight commented