Bunny ears are fuzzy: update search test node content to reflect this.

Agreed. Bunnies are clearly fuzzy.

lol wut?

@xjm might take issue with this one. http://drupal.org/user/65776 :)

Apparently so does google autocorrect :(.

This is a travesty. Some one call the president of the internet .

http://www.google.com/search?&q=bunny+fuzzy

bunnies are fluffy. A somewhat disgusting game for example lists it as a phrase. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chubby_bunny

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Fuzzy%20Bunnies fuzzy bunnies is NOT going into core. I am happy to debate fluffy vs furry :D

Well, ok , the patch actually is about the ear property of the bunny objects not the bunny class themselves. furry bunny ears finds less than half a million in google while fuzzy bunny ears has a million and a half.

s/were/are/

If all else fails, we can always resort to kittens.

From a biological accuracy standpoint, this is an exceedingly important patch that fixes a gross inaccuracy thus must be applied immediately.

As @Xano optioned, if for some reason bunnies are no longer to be referenced, then the recommended replacement from a taxonomic perspective (meta data used for selection: small, cute, fuzzy, quantity-of-internet-memes, quality-of-internet-memes, is-a-cat) is "kittens", which also has "fuzzy" ears.

#1: update_search_node_test_content-1326932-1.patch queued for re-testing.

If @chx's feedback is considered valid then perhaps we should consider moving to "fuzzy kittens"?

Re-rolled with proper attribution.

Re: #10: Why are the bunny's ears no longer fuzzy? :)

When the bunny was here, the bunny's ears were fuzzy. We don't need a novella in a Simple Test to explain why the bunny has departed. Perhaps it left for more carrot-laden gardens. Or perhaps it simply grew up.

Regardless if the patch rollers wish to get a new bunny whose ears are fuzzy, the Grammar Police approve this patch.

Don't be upset that you're in jeopardy of being outdone for the Trivial Patch of the Month Award™.

You can't outdo a single period. This patch changes two letters and the semantical meaning of a word.

Committed/pushed to 8.x. Does this need backport?

Whoops, here's the format patch like before.

Ha. :) Ok.

Committed and pushed to 7.x. Thanks!

Jen, I really wish you would stop engineering for the 80%!

Although it's true that many bunny ears are fuzzy, others are DEFINITELY furry. In fact, it's even possible for the same bunny ear to be fuzzy in one part but furry in another, as I think can be clearly seen from these pictures.

I believe it's important that Drupal support all kinds of bunnies. I therefore propose this followup patch which will allow sites to decide for themselves.

I've been following this issue for awhile, and I think @David_Rothstein has finally identified a proper, robust solution. +1 for #28.

'tis the drupal way.

I'd also add that localization is still not used in this patch, which will surely upset those German bunnies (as linked by David).

Really? An alter hook, not a BunnyEarProcessor class?