Everyone knows that the bunny's ears are not furry, they are actually fuzzy.

Files: 
CommentFileSizeAuthor
#28 bunny-ears-followup-1326932-28.patch1.42 KBDavid_Rothstein
#25 drupal-7.x-1326932-25.patch1.1 KBrump
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 36,944 pass(es).
[ View ]
#24 drupal-7.x-1326932-24.patch719 bytesrump
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 36,953 pass(es).
[ View ]
#18 bunnies_ears_are_fuzzy-1326932-17.patch1.06 KBjenlampton
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 33,757 pass(es).
[ View ]
#17 bunnies_ears_are_fuzzy-1326932-17.patch1.12 KBmsonnabaum
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 33,759 pass(es).
[ View ]
#16 bunnies_ears_are_fuzzy-1326932-15.patch739 bytesjenlampton
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 33,762 pass(es).
[ View ]
#1 update_search_node_test_content-1326932-1.patch719 bytesjenlampton
FAILED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] Unable to apply patch update_search_node_test_content-1326932-1.patch. This may be a -p0 (old style) patch, which is no longer supported by the testbots.
[ View ]

Comments

Status:Active» Needs review
StatusFileSize
new719 bytes
FAILED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] Unable to apply patch update_search_node_test_content-1326932-1.patch. This may be a -p0 (old style) patch, which is no longer supported by the testbots.
[ View ]

Status:Needs review» Reviewed & tested by the community

Agreed. Bunnies are clearly fuzzy.

lol wut?

Title:Update test node contentBunnies are fuzzy: update search test node content to reflect this.

Maybe a clearer title will help.

@xjm might take issue with this one. http://drupal.org/user/65776 :)

Apparently so does google autocorrect :(.

This is a travesty. Some one call the president of the internet .

http://www.google.com/search?&q=bunny+fuzzy

bunnies are fluffy. A somewhat disgusting game for example lists it as a phrase. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chubby_bunny

Status:Reviewed & tested by the community» Needs work

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Fuzzy%20Bunnies fuzzy bunnies is NOT going into core. I am happy to debate fluffy vs furry :D

Title:Bunnies are fuzzy: update search test node content to reflect this.Bunny ears are fuzzy: update search test node content to reflect this.
Status:Needs work» Reviewed & tested by the community

Well, ok , the patch actually is about the ear property of the bunny objects not the bunny class themselves. furry bunny ears finds less than half a million in google while fuzzy bunny ears has a million and a half.

s/were/are/

If all else fails, we can always resort to kittens.

From a biological accuracy standpoint, this is an exceedingly important patch that fixes a gross inaccuracy thus must be applied immediately.

As @Xano optioned, if for some reason bunnies are no longer to be referenced, then the recommended replacement from a taxonomic perspective (meta data used for selection: small, cute, fuzzy, quantity-of-internet-memes, quality-of-internet-memes, is-a-cat) is "kittens", which also has "fuzzy" ears.

Status:Reviewed & tested by the community» Needs work

The last submitted patch, update_search_node_test_content-1326932-1.patch, failed testing.

If @chx's feedback is considered valid then perhaps we should consider moving to "fuzzy kittens"?

Status:Needs work» Needs review
StatusFileSize
new739 bytes
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 33,762 pass(es).
[ View ]

rerolled.

StatusFileSize
new1.12 KB
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 33,759 pass(es).
[ View ]

Re-rolled with proper attribution.

StatusFileSize
new1.06 KB
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 33,757 pass(es).
[ View ]

trying with git format-patch instead :)

Re: #10: Why are the bunny's ears no longer fuzzy? :)

Status:Needs review» Reviewed & tested by the community

When the bunny was here, the bunny's ears were fuzzy. We don't need a novella in a Simple Test to explain why the bunny has departed. Perhaps it left for more carrot-laden gardens. Or perhaps it simply grew up.

Regardless if the patch rollers wish to get a new bunny whose ears are fuzzy, the Grammar Police approve this patch.

Don't be upset that you're in jeopardy of being outdone for the Trivial Patch of the Month Award™.

You can't outdo a single period. This patch changes two letters and the semantical meaning of a word.

Version:8.x-dev» 7.x-dev
Status:Reviewed & tested by the community» Patch (to be ported)

Committed/pushed to 8.x. Does this need backport?

Status:Patch (to be ported)» Needs review
StatusFileSize
new719 bytes
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 36,953 pass(es).
[ View ]

StatusFileSize
new1.1 KB
PASSED: [[SimpleTest]]: [MySQL] 36,944 pass(es).
[ View ]

Whoops, here's the format patch like before.

Status:Needs review» Reviewed & tested by the community

Works for me :)

Status:Reviewed & tested by the community» Fixed
Issue tags:+needs backport to D7

Ha. :) Ok.

Committed and pushed to 7.x. Thanks!

StatusFileSize
new1.42 KB

Jen, I really wish you would stop engineering for the 80%!

Although it's true that many bunny ears are fuzzy, others are DEFINITELY furry. In fact, it's even possible for the same bunny ear to be fuzzy in one part but furry in another, as I think can be clearly seen from these pictures.

I believe it's important that Drupal support all kinds of bunnies. I therefore propose this followup patch which will allow sites to decide for themselves.

I've been following this issue for awhile, and I think @David_Rothstein has finally identified a proper, robust solution. +1 for #28.

another layer of abstraction? *sigh*

'tis the drupal way.

I'd also add that localization is still not used in this patch, which will surely upset those German bunnies (as linked by David).

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Issue summary:View changes

Really? An alter hook, not a BunnyEarProcessor class?