Overview
Flowdock Log uses the Flowdock API module to place all of your Drupal log messages in a Flowdock Team Inbox. This is very useful to track production and non-production environments of your Drupal installations. Each Drupal multisite, environment, and installation can have its own Flow to keep logging logically separated. This can be advantageous to developers who are already using Flowdock to communicate or an enhancement to you current Drupal development team's information tracking.
Advantages
- Get group notifications to developers all Drupal log messages including errors right where they are already communicating
- Comment on messages or create message flows to help troubleshoot issues and fix them faster if there is a regression
- Use tagging to filter messages by IP, module name, and severity
This module uses Drupal 7's core queue system to only send data to Flowdock in the background. Queues are run during cron execution so if you would like message sent more or less often to Flowdock you will need to adjust how often your cron jobs are run.
Flowdock Log is implemented using hook_watchdog and can be installed along side any other logging module.
Flowdock API
You will need to download the Flowdock API module to use this module.
Link To Projects
Git Flowdock Log
git clone --branch 7.x-1.x http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/1point21/2202669.git flowdock_log
Git Flowdock Api
git clone --branch 7.x-1.x http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/1point21/2202667.git flowdock_api
Parveview
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandbox1point212202669git-7x-1x
Flowdock
Flowdock is a team collaboration app for desktop, mobile & web. Work on things that matter, be transparent and solve problems across tools, teams & time zones. Try it for free for 30 days or free for ever with up to 5 users.
Comments
Comment #1
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedComment #2
PA robot CreditAttribution: PA robot commentedProject 1: https://drupal.org/node/2203593
Project 2: https://drupal.org/node/2203589
As successful completion of the project application process results in the applicant being granted the 'Create Full Projects' permission, there is no need to take multiple applications through the process. Once the first application has been successfully approved, then the applicant can promote other projects without review. Because of this, posting multiple applications is not necessary, and results in additional workload for reviewers ... which in turn results in longer wait times for everyone in the queue. With this in mind, your secondary applications have been marked as 'closed(duplicate)', with only one application left open (chosen at random).
If you prefer that we proceed through this review process with a different application than the one which was left open, then feel free to close the 'open' application as a duplicate, and re-open one of the project applications which had been closed.
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #3
PA robot CreditAttribution: PA robot commentedThere are some errors reported by automated review tools, did you already check them? See http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandbox1point212202669git
We are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)
Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #4
Fernly CreditAttribution: Fernly commentedPlease add a git clone link. Thanks!
Comment #5
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedHere is the git clone link for the master branch from the project page.
Comment #6
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedComment #7
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedComment #8
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedComment #9
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedBased on the Drupal recommendations I have moved over to using a 7.x-1.x branch and deleted the master branch. Here is the new git clone.
This code is tested working with the required Flowdock API module. All of the coding standard issues have been resolved according to pareview.
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandbox1point212202669git-7x-1x
Comment #10
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedComment #11
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedComment #12
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedComment #13
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedComment #14
heddnComment #15
heddnfunction flowdock_log_get_watchdog_map()
Why doesn't this wrap the values in t()?
variable_del('flowdock_log*');
This doesn't work. Either write a db_delete query or list each of the variables you want to delete.
Comment #16
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedThe values in flowdock_log_get_watchdog_map() have been wrapped in the t(), I like the suggestion. The variable delete function has been updated to delete each variable individually.
Comment #17
1point21 CreditAttribution: 1point21 commentedComment #18
alvar0hurtad0Automatic Review
I'll be great if you include a link to pareview:
http://pareview.sh/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandbox1point212202669git
you've some authomated revision errors
Manual Review
Individual user account
Yes: Follows the guidelines for individual user accounts.
No duplication
NOIMHO it causes fragmentation, I think it's much better join the two projects Flowdock Log and Flowdock API into a single project.
Master Branch
YES: :D
Licensing
Yes: It follows the licensing requirements
3rd party code
Yes: I didn't found any 3rd party code so it's ok.
README.txt
No: The readme is very short and not clear. The project page is much more clear.
Code long/complex enough for review
Yes: a bunch of lines and functions.
Secure code
Yes. : I checked al SQL querys and all of then use de database API. Didn't found any cross site, scripting possibility.
Comment #19
PA robot CreditAttribution: PA robot commentedClosing due to lack of activity. If you are still working on this application, you should fix all known problems and then set the status to "Needs review". (See also the project application workflow).
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.