Problem/Motivation
When using a workflow where a draft needs to be created to update old content, that draft could inherit a date from the past.
Proposed resolution
Allow dates in the past.
Remaining tasks
(reviews needed, tests to be written or run, documentation to be written, etc.)
User interface changes
(New or changed features/functionality in the user interface, modules added or removed, changes to URL paths, changes to user interface text.)
API changes
(API changes/additions that would affect module, install profile, and theme developers, including examples of before/after code if appropriate.)
Data model changes
(Database or configuration data changes that would make stored data on an existing site incompatible with the site's updated codebase, including changes to hook_schema(), configuration schema or keys, or the expected format of stored data, etc.)
Comment | File | Size | Author |
---|---|---|---|
#2 | 3122973-2-no-validation.patch | 1.14 KB | YesCT |
Comments
Comment #2
YesCT CreditAttribution: YesCT at Lullabot for IBM commentedThis is a workaround, and not a solution.
There are a bunch of other similar issues that have been closed works as designed. So marking this the same...
but I wonder if it could be configurable to have this validation or not.
Comment #3
YesCT CreditAttribution: YesCT at Lullabot for IBM commentedComment #4
jonathan1055 CreditAttribution: jonathan1055 as a volunteer commentedHi YesCT,
The comment I wrote in SchedulerUnpublishOnConstraintValidator explains what we thought at the time:
However, if you can expand and explain your reasoning, and give a good use-case, then this could become a configurable option.