This module is a tiny user interface kind of module for user input via a popup lookup browse. The display data format on browse lookup is views. Thus, this module depends on D7 views module.
Project page:
http://drupal.org/sandbox/Jordan_Fei/1862848
Git:
git clone http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/Jordan_Fei/1862848.git lookup
It's for Drupal 7.
Reviews of other projects:
http://drupal.org/node/1859944#comment-6832838
http://drupal.org/node/1860154#comment-6833022
http://drupal.org/node/1794554#comment-6833116
http://drupal.org/node/1791048#comment-6851804
http://drupal.org/node/1868412#comment-6852592
http://drupal.org/node/1868386#comment-6852638
http://drupal.org/node/1380540#comment-6876752
http://drupal.org/node/1872926#comment-6876798
http://drupal.org/node/1696494#comment-6876846
Comments
Comment #1
vineet.osscube CreditAttribution: vineet.osscube commentedHi Jordan_Fei,
first of all there are quite a few issues to sort out such as indentation, whitespace and incorrect comment formats.
You can find them all here:
http://ventral.org/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxjordanfei1862848git
Here you can check source code whether it meets drupal coding standards or not, and advise you what to change in your code. You can repeat review after your commits, and can fix those errors.
Comment #2
Jordan_Fei CreditAttribution: Jordan_Fei commentedHi osscube,
Thanks for your comments!
One question here:
From http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/Jordan_Fei/1862848.git, there is a review comments about:
README.txt is missing. But in my git repository under the lookup/ it does have Readme.txt.
So why review comments still said that? The case sensitive of file name?
Comment #3
Jordan_Fei CreditAttribution: Jordan_Fei commentedAfter repeat review on ventral.org, the common issues have been fixed. Below is the report:
http://ventral.org/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxjordanfei1862848git-7x-1x
Comment #4
klausimanual review:
Removing review bonus tag, you can add it again if you have done another 3 reviews of other projects.
Comment #5
Jordan_Fei CreditAttribution: Jordan_Fei commentedHi klausi,
Thanks for your review!
I have fixed the issues according to your review comments.
Comment #6
Jordan_Fei CreditAttribution: Jordan_Fei commentedReviews of another projects:
http://drupal.org/node/1791048#comment-6851804
http://drupal.org/node/1868412#comment-6852592
http://drupal.org/node/1868386#comment-6852638
Added back the
PAReview: review bonustag.Comment #7
arjkap CreditAttribution: arjkap commentedHi,
The line to clone the repo seems incorrect as it asked me for your password.
Comment #8
Jordan_Fei CreditAttribution: Jordan_Fei commentedRemove the default git access name of clone command.
Comment #9
tomasbarej CreditAttribution: tomasbarej commentedJordan_Fei,
There is two issues according to the Coding standards: check Pareview.
Manual review:
Comment #9.0
tomasbarej CreditAttribution: tomasbarej commentedUpdate the git clone command(Remove the default name).
Comment #10
Jordan_Fei CreditAttribution: Jordan_Fei commentedHi tomasbarej,
Thanks for your review.
We have fixed most according to your comments. Just two items you mentioned would not be changed:
One is about test module, actually we have README.txt in lookupsample folder, and describe the data prepartion as below:
Run the sql script in your drupal database via something tool like phpmyadmin.
sql script is here: .\test\schema_and_data.sql.
Import the views example into your views via views import.
Views data is here: .\test\views_data\city_list.txt
Another is about javascript usage, this module is mainly implemented by javascript, and require a custom callback function to fill back the selected row data to UI fileds. So we will keep view_id pass by custom javascript together. Another reason, in the future this module will not only depend on form API, but also for temlate approach.
Comment #11
klausiPlease add all your reviews to the issue summary. When finishing your review comment also set the issue status either to "needs work" (you found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (you found no major flaws).
manual review:
Otherwise looks RTBC to me. Removing review bonus tag, you can add it again if you have done another 3 reviews of other projects.
Comment #12
Jordan_Fei CreditAttribution: Jordan_Fei commentedHi klausi,
Thanks for your review!
We have fixed your manual review issues.
Comment #12.0
Jordan_Fei CreditAttribution: Jordan_Fei commentedUpdated git clone commands.
Comment #12.1
Jordan_Fei CreditAttribution: Jordan_Fei commentedMove reviews of other projects to issue summary.
Comment #13
Jordan_Fei CreditAttribution: Jordan_Fei commentedChanged tag after adding three more other projects review.
Comment #14
klausino objections for more than a week, so ...
Thanks for your contribution, Jordan_Fei!
I updated your account to let you promote this to a full project and also create new projects as either a sandbox or a "full" project.
Here are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:
You can find lots more contributors chatting on IRC in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and get involved!
Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.
Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.
Comment #15.0
(not verified) CreditAttribution: commentedAdded three more other projects review comments.