'Acta HTML5' is extended and improve version of 'Acta' theme(Currently available Drupal 5 only) in term of features and design. While porting same idea into Drupal 7 theme, I prefer develop it with my own coding style with latest bleeding edge technology of HTML5 and CSS3. So I prefer new project and new name as 'Acta HTML5'.
'Acta HTML5' is a two column fixed design (optimized for width 960px).
Implement new advance cutting edge technology of HTML5 and CSS3.
Minimum use of images in theme design. So it's become more light weight and execute fast then Drupal 5 version.
Project Page :
================
https://drupal.org/sandbox/itapplication/1877502
Link of the repository :
================
git clone http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/itapplication/1877502.git acta_html5
Version : Drupal 7
================
Reviews of other projects:
================
https://drupal.org/node/2023203#comment-7562365
https://drupal.org/node/1989736#comment-7567773
https://drupal.org/node/1986548#comment-7567873
https://drupal.org/node/2024875#comment-7570091
================
Automated project review from ventral.org/pareview
http://ventral.org/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxitapplication1877502git
================
You can also find live theme at -
http://www.acta.itapplication.net/
![]()
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #9 | camparisan_d5-d7.jpg | 109.58 KB | itapplication |
| #4 | acta.png | 136.91 KB | alinouman |
| Acta HTMl5.png | 117.67 KB | itapplication |
Comments
Comment #0.0
itapplication commentedUpdate for project link.
Comment #0.1
itapplication commentedAddition of image.
Comment #0.2
itapplication commentedMinor changes.
Comment #1
itapplication commentedTo change status from active to need review.
Comment #2
PA robot commentedWe are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)
Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).
I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.
Comment #2.0
PA robot commentedMinor changes.
Comment #2.1
itapplication commentedReviews of other projects
Comment #2.2
itapplication commentedAutomated project review
Comment #3
itapplication commentedHi,
As per above guideline I review other project and contribute Drupal community by reviewing other projects/code.
Reviews of other projects:
================
Comment #4
alinouman commentedI am getting following notice when i m on homepage.
Going to line 78,That code looks strange to me what does it do
Comment #5
itapplication commentedHi alinouman,
Thanks for taking the time to review my Theme.
I have now fixed the issues of node.tpl.php. Please review the theme again and provide me your valuable feedback.
Thanks.
itapplication.
(Shiv.)
Comment #5.0
itapplication commentedSome minor changes
Comment #6
Ujval Shah commentedHi,
Manual/Code Review :
(1) .info file un-used regions mentioned :
regions[page_top] = Page top
regions[page_bottom] = Page bottom
they are in No use at page.tpl.php, please remove them from .info file.
(2) user-name and password text-boxes are not identifiable when login block is enabled in the right-side. because border is set as none and background of block and text-box are same.
#sidebar #edit-pass, #sidebar #edit-name, #sidebar #edit-name--2
border is defined as none;
I would recommend to provide some border on text-box, that will be easier for a user to identify the text-box.
Thanks,
Ujval
Comment #7
itapplication commentedHi Ujval,
Thanks for taking your valuable time to review my Theme. I fix Login block's issue of user-name and password text-boxes.
In Drupal 7 regions[page_top], regions[page_bottom] are mandatory regions which are hidden. Those two region replace Drupal 6's $closure. These regions are not use in page.tpl.php but use in html.tpl.php which I was missing and added it now.
Thanks.
Comment #7.0
itapplication commentedAddition for review link
Comment #7.1
itapplication commentedAdd reference of developer of Drupal 5 version
Comment #7.2
itapplication commentedminor changes
Comment #8
klausiThis sounds like a feature that should live in the existing acta project. Module duplication and fragmentation is a huge problem on drupal.org and we prefer collaboration over competition. Please open an issue in the acta issue queue to discuss what you need. You should also get in contact with the maintainer(s) to offer your help to move the project forward. If you cannot reach the maintainer(s) please follow the abandoned project process.
If that fails for whatever reason please get back to us and set this back to "needs review".
Comment #8.0
itapplication commentedminor changes into description.
Comment #9
itapplication commentedHi Klaus ,
Thanks for your review and suggestions.
I already ask for maintainer role for 'Acta' project to project creator/owner and I get maintainer role . As we can see in 'Acta' project original developer develop Drupal 5 theme only and no interest to extend project for next versions of theme. As I get maintainer role for 'Acta' project I am planing to develop Drupal 7 version of same theme without any changes.
In my 'Acta HTML5' I extend theme with some new features; I also develop theme with new CSS3 code. Differences of both theme/project are mention in below -
Some webmaster prefer to upgrade there site in terms of features and code only they prefer to keep similar look and feel for there site for those people I plane to develop Drupal 7 version as maintainer of 'Acta'. but at the same time I also want to offer extended design, features and code as a separate project. I want to offer Drupal community two option for a similar idea/subject. So I think it is not competition rather than it is new, improve, fresh and extended version of old idea.
I hope I explain well, why it should be separate project. I invest several hours to develop theme to contribute it to Drupal community. I trust in your fine judgement and review. I am sure you will support me and encourage me to work actively, energetically for Drupal community and allow me to create full projects.
I also attached screenshot of both theme.
Best Regards,

Shiv.(itapplication)
Comment #10
klausiFair enough, I just thought it does not make sense to port the original version of the theme without using HTML5 and CSS3 anyway.
Review of the 7.x-1.x branch:
This automated report was generated with PAReview.sh, your friendly project application review script. You can also use the online version to check your project. You have to get a review bonus to get a review from me.
manual review:
But otherwise looks RTBC to me. Removing review bonus tag, you can add it again if you have done another 3 reviews of other projects.
Assigning to stBorchert as he might have time to take a final look at this.
Comment #11
itapplication commentedHi,
Thanks for your valuable review and support.
I fix both bugs.
Here is the link for Automated Project Review from ventral.org http://ventral.org/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxitapplication1877502git
I hope you will support and encourage me to work actively, energetically for Drupal community and allow me to create full projects.
Best Regards,
Shiv.(itapplication)
Comment #12
itapplication commentedHi,
I eagerly waiting for next action.
I also keep working to contribute my favorite Drupal by review other project applications.
Here are my some other reviews -
I also add tag PAReview: review bonus tag again, hop this will make process faster.
I am waiting for to dive in Drupal organization to contribute my efforts to making it more better and better destination for 'Open Source' community.
Comment #13
itapplication commentedSorry for so much excited. I make priority normal to major. I realize that it is not right. I should wait with patience. Changing it again as normal.
Comment #14
stborchertThis may be a dumb question but where exactly did you use HTML5? I expected to see at least
<article>,<header>and<footer>in node.tpl.php ...Comment #15
itapplication commentedHi Stefan,
Thanks for you review and suggestion. I just focused on CSS3 and forgot to use HTML5. Thanks again for your guidance. I update node.tpl.php file with HTML5 code.
Your support encourage me to work actively and energetically for Drupal community.
Best Regards,
Shiv.
Comment #16
Ujval Shah commented@itapplication,
I appreciate your contribution.
Generally Naming conventions and technical vocabulary means lot in our IT Industry.
If you are not planning to add the HTML-5 support then I would suggest that you may remove HTML-5 from the title/name because that will mis-lead people since there is no usage of HTML-5.
Or you may add HTML-5 support as "up-coming" feature.
This is my suggestion only, decision will be yours only !!
Comment #17
itapplication commented@Ujval Shah,
Thanks for your suggestion. I use HTML5 code as per Stefan's suggestion. node.tpl.php file is updated with HTML5 code.
Comment #18
klausino other objections for more than a week, so ...
Thanks for your contribution, itapplication!
I updated your account to let you promote this to a full project and also create new projects as either a sandbox or a "full" project.
Here are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:
You can find lots more contributors chatting on IRC in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and get involved!
Thanks, also, for your patience with the review process. Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.
Thanks to the dedicated reviewer(s) as well.
Comment #19
itapplication commentedHi klausi,
Thanks for your support and encouragement to work actively and energetically for Drupal community. As per your suggestion I also become member of group of "Code Review of Full Project Applications".
Thanks.
Shivcharan (Shiv)
itapplication.
Comment #20.0
(not verified) commentedChanging approach. Offering new options with new features rather than competition.