This module integrates Drupal with the Diffbot API Web-Service. This web service allows extract clean article text from news article web pages.

Sandbox link: http://drupal.org/sandbox/jcarballo/1990430
GIT repository link: http://drupalcode.org/sandbox/jcarballo/1990430.git

Comments

PA robot’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work

There are some errors reported by automated review tools, did you already check them? See http://ventral.org/pareview/httpgitdrupalorgsandboxjcarballo1990430git

We are currently quite busy with all the project applications and we prefer projects with a review bonus. Please help reviewing and put yourself on the high priority list, then we will take a look at your project right away :-)

Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (they found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (they found no major flaws).

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.

garnett2125’s picture

Hi,

Manual review :

Remove dpm call line 87 diffbot.module
Review indentations https://drupal.org/coding-standards
Remove diffbot_api.install if nothing in it

garnett2125’s picture

Moreover,

diffbot.info
using files[] in .info files are only used by drupal's class autoloader, so you can remove those lines in your file.

files[] = diffbot.install
files[] = diffbot.module
files[] = diffbot.mapping.inc
files[] = diffbot.admin.inc
jcarballo’s picture

Thank you for your review and comment.

The module is still in its first version. I will consider your advice for the next commmits.

PA robot’s picture

Status: Needs work » Closed (duplicate)
Multiple Applications
It appears that there have been multiple project applications opened under your username:

Project 1: https://drupal.org/node/2092233

Project 2: https://drupal.org/node/1992586

As successful completion of the project application process results in the applicant being granted the 'Create Full Projects' permission, there is no need to take multiple applications through the process. Once the first application has been successfully approved, then the applicant can promote other projects without review. Because of this, posting multiple applications is not necessary, and results in additional workload for reviewers ... which in turn results in longer wait times for everyone in the queue. With this in mind, your secondary applications have been marked as 'closed(duplicate)', with only one application left open (chosen at random).

If you prefer that we proceed through this review process with a different application than the one which was left open, then feel free to close the 'open' application as a duplicate, and re-open one of the project applications which had been closed.

I'm a robot and this is an automated message from Project Applications Scraper.

avpaderno’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
Related issues: +#2092233: [D6] Twitter Embedded Timeline